How about? nuttx/kernel nuttx/apps
2022/11/19 13:26:53, raiden00pl: > +1 for nuttx and nuttx-apps > > sob., 19 lis 2022 o 12:17 Abdelatif Guettouche < > abdelatif.guettou...@gmail.com> napisał(a): > > > nuttx and nuttx-apps for me too. For the hyphen, as it was said before > > people can clone the repo under any name they want. We've been doing > > this ever since we joined the incubator and this is how we're > > instructing people too: > > https://nuttx.apache.org/docs/latest/quickstart/install.html#download-nuttx > > > > On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 6:42 AM fft <f...@feedforward.com.cn> wrote: > > > > > > sorry for my tentative idea! > > > > > > > > > BR, > > > > > > > > > > > > ---Original--- > > > From: "Gregory Nutt"<spudan...@gmail.com> > > > Date: Sat, Nov 19, 2022 08:26 AM > > > To: "dev"<dev@nuttx.apache.org>; > > > Subject: Re: New names of repositories > > > > > > > > > > Isn't it possible to merge the nuttx and apps into only one > > > repository？e.g: > > > > <nuttx&gt;/ > > > > |-rtos > > > > |-apps > > > > > > We discussed this option a couple of years ago and decided against > > it. I > > > was VERY strongly opposed to the idea then and I still am. > > > > > > - apps is NOT part of NuttX. It is an achitecturally unrelated, > > mish mash > > > or useful applications for NuttX, but it is not NuttX. > > > - I consists of mostly 3rd party code and should not contaminate the > > clean > > > modularity of the OS. > > > > > > If we want to consider this kind of code change than I would insist on a > > > vote and I most certainly would vote -1. I don't care about care > > about > > > hyphens or other cosmetics but I would not support any such corruption of > > > the modularity of the RTOS. > > > > > > This must never happen. > > -- Thiago Costa de Paiva FSF member: 11963 Linux User: 565327
