+1 for nuttx and nuttx-apps.

On Sat, Nov 19, 2022, 14:53 Thiago Costa de Paiva <t...@cpaiva.me> wrote:

> How about?
>
> nuttx/kernel
> nuttx/apps
>
>
> 2022/11/19 13:26:53, raiden00pl:
> > +1 for nuttx and nuttx-apps
> >
> > sob., 19 lis 2022 o 12:17 Abdelatif Guettouche <
> > abdelatif.guettou...@gmail.com> napisał(a):
> >
> > > nuttx and nuttx-apps for me too. For the hyphen, as it was said before
> > > people can clone the repo under any name they want.  We've been doing
> > > this ever since we joined the incubator and this is how we're
> > > instructing people too:
> > >
> https://nuttx.apache.org/docs/latest/quickstart/install.html#download-nuttx
> > >
> > > On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 6:42 AM fft <f...@feedforward.com.cn> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > sorry for my&nbsp;tentative idea!
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > BR,
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ---Original---
> > > > From: "Gregory Nutt"<spudan...@gmail.com&gt;
> > > > Date: Sat, Nov 19, 2022 08:26 AM
> > > > To: "dev"<dev@nuttx.apache.org&gt;;
> > > > Subject: Re: New names of repositories
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > &gt; Isn't it possible to merge the nuttx and apps into only one
> > > > repository?e.g:
> > > > &gt; <nuttx&amp;gt;/
> > > > &gt; |-rtos
> > > > &gt; |-apps
> > > >
> > > > We discussed this option a couple of years ago and decided against
> > > it.&nbsp; I
> > > > was VERY strongly opposed to the idea then and I still am.
> > > >
> > > > - apps is NOT part of NuttX.&nbsp; It is an achitecturally unrelated,
> > > mish mash
> > > > or useful applications for NuttX, but it is not NuttX.
> > > > - I consists of mostly 3rd party code and should not contaminate the
> > > clean
> > > > modularity of the OS.
> > > >
> > > > If we want to consider this kind of code change than I would insist
> on a
> > > > vote and I most certainly would vote -1.&nbsp; I don't care about
> care
> > > about
> > > > hyphens or other cosmetics but I would not support any such
> corruption of
> > > > the modularity of the RTOS.
> > > >
> > > > This must never happen.
> > >
>
> --
> Thiago Costa de Paiva
> FSF member: 11963
> Linux User: 565327
>
>

Reply via email to