Hi everyone, Oryx is currently using Ext 2.0.2 (LGPL) in the modeling mode. For a debugger we wouldn't even need to ship the Ext-parts. Our Mashup-API depends on YUI 2.7.0.
All Oryx code is MIT. Regarding SVG vs. Canvas: We experimented with Canvas a while back when it was still rather rudimentary. We might consider switching sometime this year but this is not for sure yet. We would need some thorough performance testing before that step. Cheers, Gero ________________________________________ Von: Tammo van Lessen [tvanles...@gmail.com] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 12. März 2009 21:11 An: dev@ode.apache.org Betreff: Re: GSOC project ideas Hi, The core of Oryx is AFAIK MIT licensed. It's just the editor part that uses extjs. For a debugger we'd only need a minimal Oryx server, which would be in this case also under MIT license (no extjs, no GPL). Gero may correct me if I'm wrong. So I don't see any license issues in that case. Best, Tammo phan huy wrote: > Hmm, maybe I should wait for more responds from Oryx and AODE developers. > > 2009/3/13 Alex Boisvert <boisv...@intalio.com> > >> On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 12:39 PM, Ciaran <ciar...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> I don't believe that EXTJS' license is compatible with the existing ODE >>> licenses? Would this not cause >>> you some issues ? >> >> It depends what is meant by "incompatible". The GPLv3 is compatible with >> ASLv2 although it is Apache policy to not distribute GPL'ed software so >> it's >> wouldn't be a very good choice for this project. >> >> alex >> > -- Tammo van Lessen - http://www.taval.de
