Goodmorning, I got it, hmm, what happen to the Oryx's svn repo? I couldn't check out the code.!! :(
2009/3/13 Decker, Gero <gero.dec...@hpi.uni-potsdam.de> > Hi everyone, > > Oryx is currently using Ext 2.0.2 (LGPL) in the modeling mode. For a > debugger we wouldn't even need to ship the Ext-parts. > Our Mashup-API depends on YUI 2.7.0. > > All Oryx code is MIT. > > Regarding SVG vs. Canvas: We experimented with Canvas a while back when it > was still rather rudimentary. We might consider switching sometime this year > but this is not for sure yet. We would need some thorough performance > testing before that step. > > Cheers, > Gero > > ________________________________________ > Von: Tammo van Lessen [tvanles...@gmail.com] > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 12. März 2009 21:11 > An: dev@ode.apache.org > Betreff: Re: GSOC project ideas > > Hi, > > The core of Oryx is AFAIK MIT licensed. It's just the editor part that > uses extjs. For a debugger we'd only need a minimal Oryx server, which > would be in this case also under MIT license (no extjs, no GPL). Gero > may correct me if I'm wrong. > > So I don't see any license issues in that case. > > Best, > Tammo > > phan huy wrote: > > Hmm, maybe I should wait for more responds from Oryx and AODE developers. > > > > 2009/3/13 Alex Boisvert <boisv...@intalio.com> > > > >> On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 12:39 PM, Ciaran <ciar...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >>> I don't believe that EXTJS' license is compatible with the existing ODE > >>> licenses? Would this not cause > >>> you some issues ? > >> > >> It depends what is meant by "incompatible". The GPLv3 is compatible > with > >> ASLv2 although it is Apache policy to not distribute GPL'ed software so > >> it's > >> wouldn't be a very good choice for this project. > >> > >> alex > >> > > > > > -- > Tammo van Lessen - http://www.taval.de >
