Section numbers are nice and we use them in all our documents. They help you keep track of where you are and in large documents this becomes very helpful.
So I would prefer keeping them. On Fri, Dec 7, 2018, 12:09 AM Michael Brohl <[email protected] wrote: > I‘m also in favour of keeping the section numbers. > > Thanks, > Michael > > -- > Michael Brohl > Geschäftsführer > > Fon +49 521 448 157-91 > Fax +49 521 448 157-99 > Mobil +49 160 3664918 > > Company and Management Headquarters: > ecomify GmbH, Gustav-Winkler-Straße 22, 33699 Bielefeld, Deutschland > Fon: +49 521 448157-90, Fax: +49 521 448157-99, www.ecomify.de > > Court Registration: Amtsgericht Bielefeld HRB 41683 > Chief Executive Officer: Martin Becker, Michael Brohl > > > Am 06.12.2018 um 18:30 schrieb Jacques Le Roux < > [email protected]>: > > > >> Le 03/12/2018 à 22:46, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : > >>> Le 02/12/2018 à 13:49, Mathieu Lirzin a écrit : > >>> Hello Jacques, > >>> > >>> Jacques Le Roux <[email protected]> writes: > >>> > >>>> I did not get any attention so far. So, in build.gradle, I suggest to > set : > >>>> > >>>> 'toclevels': '3' > >>>> :!sectnums: > >>> I agree with limiting the table of content level to 3, However I > >>> strongly disagree with the removal of section numbers which IME helps > >>> both in understanding the structure of the manual and in making > >>> references to a specific section. > >>> > >> Hi Mathieu, > >> > >> I did abuse of section numbers myself, and I now don't see what they > bring. Can't we refer to the section itself? So we need a cluttering number > for > >> that, and why? What does it had? Is it not cargo cult? > >> > >> Jacques > >> > >> > > No other opinions? > > > > Jacques > > >
