Thanks guys,
I see a majority and a trend so I'll simply change the toclevels from 5 to 3 in
3 days, if nobody disagree
Jacques
Le 07/12/2018 à 07:08, Taher Alkhateeb a écrit :
Section numbers are nice and we use them in all our documents. They help
you keep track of where you are and in large documents this becomes very
helpful.
So I would prefer keeping them.
On Fri, Dec 7, 2018, 12:09 AM Michael Brohl <[email protected] wrote:
I‘m also in favour of keeping the section numbers.
Thanks,
Michael
--
Michael Brohl
Geschäftsführer
Fon +49 521 448 157-91
Fax +49 521 448 157-99
Mobil +49 160 3664918
Company and Management Headquarters:
ecomify GmbH, Gustav-Winkler-Straße 22, 33699 Bielefeld, Deutschland
Fon: +49 521 448157-90, Fax: +49 521 448157-99, www.ecomify.de
Court Registration: Amtsgericht Bielefeld HRB 41683
Chief Executive Officer: Martin Becker, Michael Brohl
Am 06.12.2018 um 18:30 schrieb Jacques Le Roux <
[email protected]>:
Le 03/12/2018 à 22:46, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Le 02/12/2018 à 13:49, Mathieu Lirzin a écrit :
Hello Jacques,
Jacques Le Roux <[email protected]> writes:
I did not get any attention so far. So, in build.gradle, I suggest to
set :
'toclevels': '3'
:!sectnums:
I agree with limiting the table of content level to 3, However I
strongly disagree with the removal of section numbers which IME helps
both in understanding the structure of the manual and in making
references to a specific section.
Hi Mathieu,
I did abuse of section numbers myself, and I now don't see what they
bring. Can't we refer to the section itself? So we need a cluttering number
for
that, and why? What does it had? Is it not cargo cult?
Jacques
No other opinions?
Jacques
