+1. -- Rishi Solanki Sr Manager, Enterprise Software Development HotWax Systems Pvt. Ltd. Direct: +91-9893287847 http://www.hotwaxsystems.com www.hotwax.co
On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 8:59 PM Jacques Le Roux <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks guys, > > I see a majority and a trend so I'll simply change the toclevels from 5 to > 3 in 3 days, if nobody disagree > > Jacques > > > Le 07/12/2018 à 07:08, Taher Alkhateeb a écrit : > > Section numbers are nice and we use them in all our documents. They help > > you keep track of where you are and in large documents this becomes very > > helpful. > > > > So I would prefer keeping them. > > > > On Fri, Dec 7, 2018, 12:09 AM Michael Brohl <[email protected] > wrote: > > > >> I‘m also in favour of keeping the section numbers. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Michael > >> > >> -- > >> Michael Brohl > >> Geschäftsführer > >> > >> Fon +49 521 448 157-91 > >> Fax +49 521 448 157-99 > >> Mobil +49 160 3664918 > >> > >> Company and Management Headquarters: > >> ecomify GmbH, Gustav-Winkler-Straße 22, 33699 Bielefeld, Deutschland > >> Fon: +49 521 448157-90, Fax: +49 521 448157-99, www.ecomify.de > >> > >> Court Registration: Amtsgericht Bielefeld HRB 41683 > >> Chief Executive Officer: Martin Becker, Michael Brohl > >> > >>> Am 06.12.2018 um 18:30 schrieb Jacques Le Roux < > >> [email protected]>: > >>>> Le 03/12/2018 à 22:46, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : > >>>>> Le 02/12/2018 à 13:49, Mathieu Lirzin a écrit : > >>>>> Hello Jacques, > >>>>> > >>>>> Jacques Le Roux <[email protected]> writes: > >>>>> > >>>>>> I did not get any attention so far. So, in build.gradle, I suggest > to > >> set : > >>>>>> 'toclevels': '3' > >>>>>> :!sectnums: > >>>>> I agree with limiting the table of content level to 3, However I > >>>>> strongly disagree with the removal of section numbers which IME helps > >>>>> both in understanding the structure of the manual and in making > >>>>> references to a specific section. > >>>>> > >>>> Hi Mathieu, > >>>> > >>>> I did abuse of section numbers myself, and I now don't see what they > >> bring. Can't we refer to the section itself? So we need a cluttering > number > >> for > >>>> that, and why? What does it had? Is it not cargo cult? > >>>> > >>>> Jacques > >>>> > >>>> > >>> No other opinions? > >>> > >>> Jacques > >>> >
