yeah I guess that would work too if it is okay to push a big change
into that branch


On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 1:44 PM Deepak Dixit <deepak.di...@hotwax.co> wrote:
>
> We can create a branch and can backport java upgrade changes to 18.12 as
> well.
> Thanks & Regards
> --
> Deepak Dixit
>
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 3:21 PM Taher Alkhateeb <slidingfilame...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > It's okay whatever folks decide, but I think it would be nice if we
> > can upgrade Java for a new branch.
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 12:05 PM Nicolas Malin <nicolas.ma...@nereide.fr>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Four days before the end of year :)
> > >
> > > If no opposition, I will create it tomorrow
> > >
> > > Nicolas
> > >
> > > On 19/12/2018 11:44, Deepak Dixit wrote:
> > > > I agree,
> > > >
> > > > We should create the next release (18.12) for framework and plugins.
> > > > I'll check for issues, and if found will share here.
> > > > Thanks & Regards
> > > > --
> > > > Deepak Dixit
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 3:38 PM Jacques Le Roux <
> > > > jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Le 19/12/2018 à 10:14, Nicolas Malin a écrit :
> > > >>> Hello,
> > > >>>
> > > >>> The time pass and the end year is near, maybe it's the time to
> > prepare
> > > >> next releases branches.
> > > >>> Two questions :
> > > >>>
> > > >>>   * Are you agree to create releases 18.12 branches for framework and
> > > >> plugin ?
> > > >>>   * Do you have some priority issue that you absolutely need fbefore
> > > >> create theses branches ?
> > > >>> I see for my point of view OFBIZ-4361 and OFBIZ-10145. I
> > > >> believe/will/try to free some time for working on.
> > > >>> Cheers,
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Nicolas
> > > >>>
> > > >> Hi Nicolas, All,
> > > >>
> > > >> As I think we agreed, we need to check all the blocker before
> > releasing
> > > >> (not freezing) .
> > > >>
> > > >> So IMO OFBIZ-4361 and OFBIZ-10145 are not blocker for freezing a
> > possible
> > > >> 18.12 branches (trunk+plugins)
> > > >>
> > > >> Thanks
> > > >>
> > > >> Jacques
> > > >>
> > > >>
> >

Reply via email to