It's awesome to revive this discussion Michael. +1 of course. We need to think practically of our workflows though and whether we want a linear vs non-linear history model. I prefer the latter to allow proper decentralized workflows but it's up to everyone here to decide. I think the overall process is described thoroughly and we can adhere to it for the most part.
On Sat, Jan 12, 2019 at 9:35 PM Deepak Dixit <deepak.di...@hotwax.co> wrote: > > We are using git since long and it's a great tool for collaboration. > It has distributed version control system so you don't need an internet > connection to view history and branch switching. > > Thanks Taher for nicly describing it. > > +1 for Git. > > Thanks & Regards > -- > Deepak Dixit > > > > On Sat, Jan 12, 2019 at 11:54 PM Aditya Sharma < > aditya.sha...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote: > > > +1 for Git > > > > Thanks and Regards, > > Aditya Sharma > > > > On Sat, Jan 12, 2019, 9:06 PM Suraj Khurana <suraj.khur...@hotwax.co > > wrote: > > > > > +1 to move from SVN to Git. > > > > > > -- > > > Best Regards, > > > Suraj Khurana > > > Technical Consultant > > > > > > On Sat, Jan 12, 2019 at 7:12 PM Mathieu Lirzin < > > mathieu.lir...@nereide.fr> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hello Michael, > > > > > > > > Michael Brohl <michael.br...@ecomify.de> writes: > > > > > > > > > I'd like to revive this discussion again. > > > > > > > > Do we still need to discuss it? If the response is not obviously “yes > > > > we should move to Git” now that Git has become ubiquitous and that SVN > > > > is a moribund tool, then this community has a serious problem. :-) > > > > > > > > Joke aside I think the question should rather be: > > > > > > > > Is there anyone here opposing to the move from SVN to Git? > > > > > > > > Thanks for reviving this topic! > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Mathieu Lirzin > > > > GPG: F2A3 8D7E EB2B 6640 5761 070D 0ADE E100 9460 4D37 > > > > > > > > >
