Hello Jacques, Jacques Le Roux <[email protected]> writes:
> Le 13/06/2019 à 15:19, Mathieu Lirzin a écrit : >> Jacques Le Roux <[email protected]> writes: >> >>> I don't agree, as an ASF member I reply to a lot of MLs. I don't want to be >>> bothered by that for all of them. >>> Deepak's answer with INFRA-18478 seems to be the way we should handle that. >> >> If you have a huge pile of ML subscriptions (50? 100?), you can >> configure your email client incrementally each time you send an email to >> a list that is not already configured and someday they will eventually >> all be properly configured. \o/ >> >> Thanks. > I tried but could not find a way in a reasonable time After doing some research I have found a documentation [1] which is not directly about setting the ‘Reply-to’ header but the ‘Mail-Followup-To’ and ‘Mail-Reply-To’ headers which are workarounds for the “reply-to munging” done by mailing-lists [2]. After configuring Thunderbird this way, people using Mail User Agents (MUA) understanding those headers [3] will not have to remember to remove you from the recipient list when responding to the list. I haven't found any information regarding Gmail or other Webmail clients, but hopefully they understand those headers too. Thanks. [1] https://wiki.mozilla.org/Thunderbird:Help_Documentation:Mail-Followup-To_and_Mail-Reply-To [2] http://cr.yp.to/proto/replyto.html [3] https://www.leptonite.org/mft/software.html -- Mathieu Lirzin GPG: F2A3 8D7E EB2B 6640 5761 070D 0ADE E100 9460 4D37
