Hi Taher,
Actually it has already been reverted
Jacques
Le 19/12/2019 à 12:04, Taher Alkhateeb a écrit :
Also, if there are disagreements on a direction among members then it is
usually the case that a -1 from a binding vote requires a revert and
starting a discussion. Then we can either have consensus, lazy consensus or
the issue is shut down.
I'm saying what should be done, just laying out the standard rules we
usually run by.
On Thu, Dec 19, 2019, 1:59 PM Taher Alkhateeb <slidingfilame...@gmail.com>
wrote:
May I suggest inquiring from the community on whether this feature is
important to them? Pehaps on user@? This way maybe we can have a more
informed decision on whether to adopt this change.
On Thu, Dec 19, 2019, 10:13 AM Jacques Le Roux <
jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote:
Le 18/12/2019 à 21:09, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Hi Samuel, All,
Le 18/12/2019 à 14:00, Samuel Trégouët a écrit : Le 18/12/2019 à 12:09,
Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Mathieu asks Michael to provide an "explanation regarding why it
matters in production environments to be able to patch" component-load.xml
files
yes we are still waiting for your answer Michael ;) In my opinion we
cannot go ahead in this discussion without your answer, without your
need about component-load.xml: are you trying to avoid loading a
particular framework component? do you patch a framework component and
need another one to be loaded first to make your patch works? ...
That's an interesting point indeed. Have you your own framework
component/s Michael ?
Note: I include applications components here
Jacques
