Hello Taher, Taher Alkhateeb <[email protected]> writes:
> Also, if there are disagreements on a direction among members then it is > usually the case that a -1 from a binding vote requires a revert and > starting a discussion. Then we can either have consensus, lazy consensus or > the issue is shut down. > > I'm saying what should be done, just laying out the standard rules we > usually run by. For more precision, a veto for code-modification is not enough for justifying a revert [1]: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- To prevent vetos from being used capriciously, they must be accompanied by a technical justification showing why the change is bad (opens a security exposure, negativelyaffects performance, etc. ). A veto without a justification is invalid and has no weight. --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- [1] https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#Veto -- Mathieu Lirzin GPG: F2A3 8D7E EB2B 6640 5761 070D 0ADE E100 9460 4D37
