OK, I have done, don't worry. I used the <xmlproperty> ant task. -Bruno
2009/2/3 Bruno Busco <[email protected]> > Better looking into this I am trying to implement a much simpler solution: > I have changed the ant svninfo task to create a svninfo.xml file with all > SVN info. It looks like this: > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > <?xml version="1.0"?> > <info> > <entry > kind="dir" > path="." > revision="740301"> > <url>https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ofbiz/trunk</url> > <repository> > <root>https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf</root> > <uuid>13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68</uuid> > </repository> > <wc-info> > <schedule>normal</schedule> > </wc-info> > <commit > revision="740301"> > <author>buscob</author> > <date>2009-02-03T13:26:11.171854Z</date> > </commit> > </entry> > </info> > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > I need now the ant task to extract the entry revision (and may be the url) > attributes from this file and append it into a simple text file that is > included in the footer.ftl > > Does somebody know how to have an ant task read a tag attribute and then > write it to a textfile? > Many thanks, > Bruno > > > 2009/2/3 Jacques Le Roux <[email protected]> > > Thanks Bruno, >> >> Yes, like you I think we should consider more seriously this issue. >> Maybe your requirements (Subversion) in >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1700?focusedCommentId=12586148#action_12586148are >> already satisfied on the main demo server (please someone can answer >> here) ? They are on my alternate dermo server. I just tested (merged easily) >> it works well. >> Some points though, bsh -> groovy, Some i18n needed in svninfo.txt >> One question : I don't think we should put this in hot-deploy, should we ? >> >> Jacques >> >> From: "Bruno Busco" <[email protected]> >> >>> A patch is available in >>> *OFBIZ-2164<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2164> >>> * >>> -Bruno* >>> * >>> 2009/2/3 Bruno Busco <[email protected]> >>> >>> OK, I will move to the footer. >>>> >>>> BTW for the SVN info, could we think to use the patch included here? * >>>> OFBIZ-1700 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1700> >>>> >>>> * >>>> With this change a new ant target was added to run the svn info command >>>> and >>>> the results were available to be shown in an "about" application. >>>> May be now a better implementation could be to have the svn info >>>> generated >>>> string available in a portlet. >>>> WDYT? >>>> >>>> -Bruno >>>> ** >>>> 2009/2/2 Jacques Le Roux <[email protected]> >>>> >>>> +1 for footer (and if we could have the release number it would be even >>>> >>>>> greater ;o) >>>>> >>>>> Jacques >>>>> >>>>> From: "David E Jones" <[email protected]> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Shouldn't that be the time the server thinks it is for the user, and >>>>>> therefore something that we might want visible to the user just in >>>>>> case >>>>>> their time zone setting is off or something? >>>>>> >>>>>> Of course, it doesn't need to be in the header... I like the footer >>>>>> better personally for less critical/useful info like that. >>>>>> >>>>>> -David >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Feb 2, 2009, at 12:57 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> If we need information on the server there is the log in webtools. I >>>>>> >>>>>>> can't see why an end user would be interested by server time, but I >>>>>>> may be >>>>>>> wrong... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Jacques >>>>>>> >>>>>>> From: "Bruno Busco" <[email protected]> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On a second thought... are we sure this is not usefull to know the >>>>>>>> server's >>>>>>>> time? >>>>>>>> If this is not the case and there are not objections I can remove >>>>>>>> it. >>>>>>>> -Bruno >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 2009/2/1 Bilgin Ibryam <[email protected]> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> In case my vote was not very clear: + 1 to remove it >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Feb 1, 2009, at 2:20 PM, Bilgin Ibryam wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> + 1 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Bilgin >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Feb 1, 2009, at 12:13 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I just realise that we have a date/time in header. Does it make >>>>>>>>>> sense to >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> have this here ? >>>>>>>>>>> Time (and even date) is not updated and each modern OS provides >>>>>>>>>>> this >>>>>>>>>>> information in some taskbar anyway. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Jacques >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>> >
