Just wondering - what happens when you've done an export instead of a co? Cheers, Tim -- Tim Ruppert HotWax Media http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594 f:801.649.6595 ----- "Bruno Busco" <[email protected]> wrote: > Better looking into this I am trying to implement a much simpler > solution: > I have changed the ant svninfo task to create a svninfo.xml file with > all > SVN info. It looks like this: > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > <?xml version="1.0"?> > <info> > <entry > kind="dir" > path="." > revision="740301"> > <url>https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ofbiz/trunk</url> > <repository> > <root>https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf</root> > <uuid>13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68</uuid> > </repository> > <wc-info> > <schedule>normal</schedule> > </wc-info> > <commit > revision="740301"> > <author>buscob</author> > <date>2009-02-03T13:26:11.171854Z</date> > </commit> > </entry> > </info> > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > I need now the ant task to extract the entry revision (and may be the > url) > attributes from this file and append it into a simple text file that > is > included in the footer.ftl > > Does somebody know how to have an ant task read a tag attribute and > then > write it to a textfile? > Many thanks, > Bruno > > > 2009/2/3 Jacques Le Roux <[email protected]> > > > Thanks Bruno, > > > > Yes, like you I think we should consider more seriously this issue. > > Maybe your requirements (Subversion) in > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1700?focusedCommentId=12586148#action_12586148are > already satisfied on the main demo server (please someone can answer > > here) ? They are on my alternate dermo server. I just tested (merged > easily) > > it works well. > > Some points though, bsh -> groovy, Some i18n needed in svninfo.txt > > One question : I don't think we should put this in hot-deploy, > should we ? > > > > Jacques > > > > From: "Bruno Busco" <[email protected]> > > > >> A patch is available in > >> *OFBIZ-2164<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2164> > >> * > >> -Bruno* > >> * > >> 2009/2/3 Bruno Busco <[email protected]> > >> > >> OK, I will move to the footer. > >>> > >>> BTW for the SVN info, could we think to use the patch included > here? * > >>> OFBIZ-1700 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1700> > >>> > >>> * > >>> With this change a new ant target was added to run the svn info > command > >>> and > >>> the results were available to be shown in an "about" application. > >>> May be now a better implementation could be to have the svn info > >>> generated > >>> string available in a portlet. > >>> WDYT? > >>> > >>> -Bruno > >>> ** > >>> 2009/2/2 Jacques Le Roux <[email protected]> > >>> > >>> +1 for footer (and if we could have the release number it would be > even > >>> > >>>> greater ;o) > >>>> > >>>> Jacques > >>>> > >>>> From: "David E Jones" <[email protected]> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Shouldn't that be the time the server thinks it is for the user, > and > >>>>> therefore something that we might want visible to the user just > in > >>>>> case > >>>>> their time zone setting is off or something? > >>>>> > >>>>> Of course, it doesn't need to be in the header... I like the > footer > >>>>> better personally for less critical/useful info like that. > >>>>> > >>>>> -David > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> On Feb 2, 2009, at 12:57 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> If we need information on the server there is the log in > webtools. I > >>>>> > >>>>>> can't see why an end user would be interested by server time, > but I > >>>>>> may be > >>>>>> wrong... > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Jacques > >>>>>> > >>>>>> From: "Bruno Busco" <[email protected]> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On a second thought... are we sure this is not usefull to know > the > >>>>>>> server's > >>>>>>> time? > >>>>>>> If this is not the case and there are not objections I can > remove it. > >>>>>>> -Bruno > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> 2009/2/1 Bilgin Ibryam <[email protected]> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> In case my vote was not very clear: + 1 to remove it > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On Feb 1, 2009, at 2:20 PM, Bilgin Ibryam wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> + 1 > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Bilgin > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> On Feb 1, 2009, at 12:13 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> I just realise that we have a date/time in header. Does it > make > >>>>>>>>> sense to > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> have this here ? > >>>>>>>>>> Time (and even date) is not updated and each modern OS > provides > >>>>>>>>>> this > >>>>>>>>>> information in some taskbar anyway. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Jacques > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>> > >>
