Tim, if you do an export instead a checkout you could change the script you use to write the revision number in the svninfo.ftl file as it were written by the ant svninfo task.
In this way we will have both the svn copy of ofbiz and the hotwaxmedia demo exactly the same (no footer.ftl hacking). Thank you, -Bruno 2009/2/3 Tim Ruppert <[email protected]> > Just wondering - what happens when you've done an export instead of a co? > > Cheers, > Tim > -- > Tim Ruppert > HotWax Media > http://www.hotwaxmedia.com > > o:801.649.6594 > f:801.649.6595 > > ----- "Bruno Busco" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Better looking into this I am trying to implement a much simpler > > solution: > > I have changed the ant svninfo task to create a svninfo.xml file with > > all > > SVN info. It looks like this: > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > <?xml version="1.0"?> > > <info> > > <entry > > kind="dir" > > path="." > > revision="740301"> > > <url>https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ofbiz/trunk</url> > > <repository> > > <root>https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf</root> > > <uuid>13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68</uuid> > > </repository> > > <wc-info> > > <schedule>normal</schedule> > > </wc-info> > > <commit > > revision="740301"> > > <author>buscob</author> > > <date>2009-02-03T13:26:11.171854Z</date> > > </commit> > > </entry> > > </info> > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > I need now the ant task to extract the entry revision (and may be the > > url) > > attributes from this file and append it into a simple text file that > > is > > included in the footer.ftl > > > > Does somebody know how to have an ant task read a tag attribute and > > then > > write it to a textfile? > > Many thanks, > > Bruno > > > > > > 2009/2/3 Jacques Le Roux <[email protected]> > > > > > Thanks Bruno, > > > > > > Yes, like you I think we should consider more seriously this issue. > > > Maybe your requirements (Subversion) in > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1700?focusedCommentId=12586148#action_12586148are > > already satisfied on the main demo server (please someone can answer > > > here) ? They are on my alternate dermo server. I just tested (merged > > easily) > > > it works well. > > > Some points though, bsh -> groovy, Some i18n needed in svninfo.txt > > > One question : I don't think we should put this in hot-deploy, > > should we ? > > > > > > Jacques > > > > > > From: "Bruno Busco" <[email protected]> > > > > > >> A patch is available in > > >> *OFBIZ-2164<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2164> > > >> * > > >> -Bruno* > > >> * > > >> 2009/2/3 Bruno Busco <[email protected]> > > >> > > >> OK, I will move to the footer. > > >>> > > >>> BTW for the SVN info, could we think to use the patch included > > here? * > > >>> OFBIZ-1700 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1700> > > >>> > > >>> * > > >>> With this change a new ant target was added to run the svn info > > command > > >>> and > > >>> the results were available to be shown in an "about" application. > > >>> May be now a better implementation could be to have the svn info > > >>> generated > > >>> string available in a portlet. > > >>> WDYT? > > >>> > > >>> -Bruno > > >>> ** > > >>> 2009/2/2 Jacques Le Roux <[email protected]> > > >>> > > >>> +1 for footer (and if we could have the release number it would be > > even > > >>> > > >>>> greater ;o) > > >>>> > > >>>> Jacques > > >>>> > > >>>> From: "David E Jones" <[email protected]> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> Shouldn't that be the time the server thinks it is for the user, > > and > > >>>>> therefore something that we might want visible to the user just > > in > > >>>>> case > > >>>>> their time zone setting is off or something? > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Of course, it doesn't need to be in the header... I like the > > footer > > >>>>> better personally for less critical/useful info like that. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> -David > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> On Feb 2, 2009, at 12:57 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > > >>>>> > > >>>>> If we need information on the server there is the log in > > webtools. I > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> can't see why an end user would be interested by server time, > > but I > > >>>>>> may be > > >>>>>> wrong... > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Jacques > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> From: "Bruno Busco" <[email protected]> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> On a second thought... are we sure this is not usefull to know > > the > > >>>>>>> server's > > >>>>>>> time? > > >>>>>>> If this is not the case and there are not objections I can > > remove it. > > >>>>>>> -Bruno > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> 2009/2/1 Bilgin Ibryam <[email protected]> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> In case my vote was not very clear: + 1 to remove it > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> On Feb 1, 2009, at 2:20 PM, Bilgin Ibryam wrote: > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> + 1 > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> Bilgin > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> On Feb 1, 2009, at 12:13 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> I just realise that we have a date/time in header. Does it > > make > > >>>>>>>>> sense to > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> have this here ? > > >>>>>>>>>> Time (and even date) is not updated and each modern OS > > provides > > >>>>>>>>>> this > > >>>>>>>>>> information in some taskbar anyway. > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> Jacques > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>> > > >> >
