Is this true: every change to the home page must be voted on? Or is that
what you are proposing?
Please clarify.
Regards,
Ruth
David E Jones wrote:
Come on people, please stop pushing this.
There are only two possible outcomes that I can see, and I don't like either of
them:
1. the PMC has to vote on EVERY change to the home page, especially in the news section,
to make sure everyone agrees that it is "news"
2. we remove the news section, and anything else that might change regularly,
from the home page
Do we really have to resort to the most restrictive measures possible? Can't we
get along with something less?
Either way, I've pulled my stuff from the page and I'm out of this
conversation. Have fun.
-David
On Mar 17, 2010, at 6:32 PM, Sharan-F wrote:
Hi David
If that's what the community wants then thats OK with me but I think we need
to define what 'news' is. For example is the book by Packt publishing
classed as news or promotional material? (To me its news but it also
promotes Packt)
I think if there can be any ambiguity then we need something the say what is
acceptable and what is not. If Tim has this covered then great but I'd still
think it would be good to have something written somewhere so we're all
clear on what's what.
Thanks
Sharan