Hi Jacopo, Well thought and a good suggestion IMHO. Definitely a good middle ground solution that supports all components and keeps things alive
Taher Alkhateeb Taher Alkhateeb On Nov 7, 2014 3:05 PM, "Jacopo Cappellato" < jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com> wrote: > On Nov 7, 2014, at 12:36 PM, Jacques Le Roux <jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> > wrote: > > > This will no longer work for some components (scrum for instance) > > > > I believe we could be reintroduce some specialpurpose component in next > release, > > There is a difference between including them in a release branch and > including them in the releases: I would be more inclined to include (all of > them) in the release branches but exclude them from the releases; this > would simplify the work required to keep them in synch and would also help > end users to integrate them. > However the specialpurpose components should be disabled in order to avoid > the users to get a default ootb release/branch with enabled special purpose > functionalities that may override the more general purpose ones offered by > the core applications. > We should still consider the idea of providing separate products for the > specialpurpose components (and having them in the branch would help this > process). > If the idea I am proposing here (include the specialpurpose components in > the branch but not in the releases) we could re-add them (as disabled) also > to the 13.07 branch but exclude them from all the releases (13.07.02 > etc...): this will protect all the stabilization work we did on the branch > (and also from some licensing issues that may affects some of the artifacts > in some of the specialpurpose components) . > > Jacopo > > > as long as they are backed by some efforts, come to mind > > project manager (Pierre Smits?) > > scrum (Hans?) > > examples and ext (at least me) > > myportal (French people use portals, not sure for myportal?) > > > > Other components? > > > > IRRW Jacopo said he was not against a new discussion on this subject (I > could not find his message), what do you think? > > > > Jacques > > > > Le 21/10/2014 09:06, gil portenseigne a écrit : > >> I've never used svn external property, just discovering. That sounds > usefull and i'll try it out ! > >> > >> Thanks for the advice ! > >> > >> Gil > >> > >> > >> On 20/10/2014 19:08, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > >>> I use svn external in the stable demo, already explained that in the > MLs: see > https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/trunk/tools/demo-backup/branch13.7-demo.patch?view=markup > >>> You can use the same to keep in sync, only consider projectmgr in your > case. Since there is no projectmgr in R13.07 the risk of gettins conflicts > or build issue is extremely low > >>> > >>> Jacques > >>> > >>> Le 20/10/2014 17:28, gil portenseigne a écrit : > >>>> Hi Jacopo, > >>>> > >>>> Ok then, i will have to re-synchronize new trunk devs each time i'll > feel it necessary. My fear is about incompatibility between 13.07 and trunk > technologies, but that won't happen soon, or i might backport the evolution > into my local environment. > >>>> > >>>> That will do the job ! > >>>> > >>>> Thanks > >>>> > >>>> Gil > >>>> > >>>> On 20/10/2014 16:36, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: > >>>>> Hi Gil, > >>>>> > >>>>> I would suggest to check it out from the trunk to the hot-deploy > folder of 13.07: > >>>>> > >>>>> cd hot-deploy > >>>>> svn co > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ofbiz/trunk/specialpurpose/projectmgr > >>>>> > >>>>> Jacopo > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> On Oct 20, 2014, at 4:11 PM, gil portenseigne < > gil.portensei...@nereide.fr> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> Hi all, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I don't want to relaunch the debate around including the > projectMgmt component into the 13.07 release, but i have a question : > >>>>>> > >>>>>> What is the best way to import the projectMgr component in my local > 13.07 checkout environment, to start using it in a real project and to > contribute on upgrading it for trunk and/or the 13.07 release ? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Trunk technical evolution might be a problem if a want to stick to > 13.07 release with projectMgmt features. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Should I use trunk instead ? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Cheers > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Gil > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> -- > >>>>>> <siteon0.jpg> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Gil Portenseigne > >>>>>> Consultant ERP OFBiz > >>>>>> Société Néréide > >>>>>> 3b Les isles > >>>>>> 37270 Veretz > >>>>>> Tel : 09 74 53 46 09, puis 1, poste 61 > >>>>>> Mob : 06 82 740 444 > >>>>>> www.nereide.fr > >>>> > >>>> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> <Mail Attachment.jpeg> > >> > >> Gil Portenseigne > >> Consultant ERP OFBiz > >> Société Néréide > >> 3b Les isles > >> 37270 Veretz > >> Tel : 09 74 53 46 09, puis 1, poste 61 > >> Mob : 06 82 740 444 > >> www.nereide.fr > >> > > > >
