Hi scott and jacopo, yeah good point excuse me for not being clear. I suggest that if we want to revive it then the UI layer on top is fired up separately. so in a way it should be redesigned. my apologies I didn't express my thoughts clearly.
I used the analogy with the mobile just to say that this is how it should be not what it is. Regards, Taher Alkhateeb On Thursday, 21 July 2016, Scott Gray <[email protected]> wrote: > Yeah exactly, POS *is* OFBiz, just running with a different configuration > that enables a thick-client UI on top. Is isn't the solely the client, > it's both the client and the server. > > > On 22 July 2016 at 01:30, Jacopo Cappellato < > [email protected] <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > Hi Taher, > > > > On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 3:24 PM, Taher Alkhateeb < > > [email protected] <javascript:;> > > > wrote: > > > > > Hi scott, > > > > > > I would suggest that it starts on its own. just like any software > system > > > that communicates with your system. The POS is just a desktop app that > > > communicates with the OFBiz server. > > > > > > This is kind of true but... the POS desktop app used to require a full > > OFBiz instance running on the desktop in "POS" mode (thus the need of the > > flag); this instance used to communicate with the master OFBiz instance > at > > server side. > > > > Anyway, this is just for archive history because, as Jacques pointed out, > > the POS component is probably no more useful and used. > > > > Jacopo > > >
