I will try to exclude some useless dependencies in solr lib later. BTW, is there any tool to find dependencies conflicts in gradle?
-----邮件原件----- 发件人: Taher Alkhateeb [mailto:slidingfilame...@gmail.com] 发送时间: 2017年1月3日 13:57 收件人: OFBIZ Development Mailing List 主题: Re: Proposal to rename specialpurpose to plugins Hi Scott and All, Recalling earlier discussions, one of the important reasons for creating the plug-in manager is to remove non-core components (perhaps to a separate repo) from OFBiz while having the ability to maintain them easily (i.e. the build system takes care of downloading and incorporating into the code base). So I think what this means is whether you rename or not most of the specialpurpose documentation will be irrelevant anyway if we apply this strategy. Of course the reason for this direction is to maintain a lightweight core. If you just look at the "birt" and "solr" components for example you will be see a massive amount of lib dependencies and some entanglements with core. On Jan 2, 2017 11:42 PM, "Scott Gray" <scott.g...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote: > Ok thanks, it just wasn't clear to me. > > My only concern with renaming it just for the sake of renaming it is > that we have to make sure our documentation reflects the change and we > have to be aware that anyone searching our email archives is going to > be confused about constant references to a folder that doesn't exist. > > I'm a +0, I don't want to get in the way of change but at the same > time I'm not sure the benefits outweigh the potential confusion. > > Regards > Scott > > On 3 January 2017 at 09:11, Taher Alkhateeb > <slidingfilame...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Hi Scott, > > > > I don't know, it depends on what people prefer. We can either delete > > the component-load.xml in /plugins and remove hot-deploy, or keep > > the component-load.xml and hot-deploy. I lean slightly towards the > > former but no strong opinion. > > > > I think one thing at a time though. The focus now is to rename and > prepare > > a mechanism for handling plugins. Perhaps we can start aanother > > thread to discuss the next steps moving forward. > > > > Cheers, > > > > Taher Alkhateeb > > > > On Jan 2, 2017 11:02 PM, "Scott Gray" <scott.g...@hotwaxsystems.com> > > wrote: > > > > > What's the plan for the hot-deploy folder? Remove it? > > > > > > Regards > > > Scott > > > > > > On 3 January 2017 at 08:26, gil portenseigne < > > gil.portensei...@nereide.fr> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > Gil > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 02/01/2017 17:45, Taher Alkhateeb wrote: > > > > > > > >> Hello Everyone, > > > >> > > > >> In reference to earlier discussions and threads on the above > subject, > > I > > > am > > > >> hereby proposing renaming the directory "specialpurpose" to > > "plugins". I > > > >> have patch ready with all tests passing. > > > >> > > > >> Ref discussion: > > > >> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/9bb4fba6ec56bd52a5bc55e > > > >> 44ba1672f088ec33eeb8a1af4d16fd6d2@%3Cdev.ofbiz.apache.org%3E > > > >> > > > >> Cheers, > > > >> > > > >> Taher Alkhateeb > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >
