On Jul 13, 2010, at 8:13 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote: > > Hey guys, > > Most of our CI build fail. > IMHO, it's not relevant to use a CI system if we never take build results > into account. > Some users noticed that too, and we should fix that situation. > > So, I tried digging into continuum logs and fix all issues (as much as > possible). > To name but a few, i dug into an XMLInputFactory issue (thanks Thiago) > recently introduced in the trunk. > > http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E17477_01/javaee/5/api/javax/xml/stream/XMLInputFactory.html > http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E17409_01/javase/6/docs/api/javax/xml/stream/XMLInputFactory.html > > As described by the javadoc, #newFactory should be available in Java 6 but > actually, it appears only in a minor release. > > Anyway, I registered to Continuum in order to edit OpenEJB jobs. I was > looking if we could easily switch to the latest VM.
For this particular issue maybe we should be compiling/using the geronimo stax api and woodstox stax implementations? Not sure how hard this is to set up in maven. There should be a couple other places where we need something more advanced than the jvm, such as annotations 1.1. thanks david jencks > > Daniel suggested to open the INFRA Jira against continuum. But before that, > I want to be sure that the latest VM is not already installed. > > Can anyone give me rights to edit jobs? > > Your opinion is also welcome. > > Jean-Louis > > -- > View this message in context: > http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Continuum-and-OpenEJB-tp2287580p2287580.html > Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
