On Jul 13, 2010, at 9:48 AM, David Jencks wrote: > > On Jul 13, 2010, at 8:13 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote: > >> >> Hey guys, >> >> Most of our CI build fail. >> IMHO, it's not relevant to use a CI system if we never take build results >> into account. >> Some users noticed that too, and we should fix that situation. >> >> So, I tried digging into continuum logs and fix all issues (as much as >> possible). >> To name but a few, i dug into an XMLInputFactory issue (thanks Thiago) >> recently introduced in the trunk. >> >> http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E17477_01/javaee/5/api/javax/xml/stream/XMLInputFactory.html >> http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E17409_01/javase/6/docs/api/javax/xml/stream/XMLInputFactory.html >> >> As described by the javadoc, #newFactory should be available in Java 6 but >> actually, it appears only in a minor release. >> >> Anyway, I registered to Continuum in order to edit OpenEJB jobs. I was >> looking if we could easily switch to the latest VM. > > For this particular issue maybe we should be compiling/using the geronimo > stax api and woodstox stax implementations? Not sure how hard this is to set > up in maven. There should be a couple other places where we need something > more advanced than the jvm, such as annotations 1.1.
Maybe we could offer a fallback way to parse the xml if they don't have that particular class available. -David
