Thanks a lot Daniel.
David J. already changed the related class. So it should compile.

Anyway, thanks a lot.
Jean-Louis




Daniel S. Haischt-3 wrote:
> 
> The JDK got upgraded to a newer version. Please try again:
> 
> gmcdonald: java version "1.6.0_20"
> gmcdonald: Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_20-b02)
> gmcdonald: Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 16.3-b01, mixed mode,
> sharing)java version "1.6.0_20"
> gmcdonald: Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_20-b02)
> gmcdonald: Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 16.3-b01, mixed mode,
> sharing)ddddgmcdon...@vmbuild:~$ java -version
> gmcdonald: java version "1.6.0_20"
> gmcdonald: Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_20-b02)
> gmcdonald: Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 16.3-b01, mixed mode,
> sharing)
> gmcdonald: opps
> gmcdonald: anyway, its the correct version now
> 
> On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 9:48 AM, dsh <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>> FYI
>>
>> gmcdonald: gmcdon...@vmbuild:~$ java -version
>> gmcdonald: java version "1.6.0_06"
>> gmcdonald: Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_06-b02)
>> gmcdonald: Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 10.0-b22, mixed mode,
>> sharing)
>> gmcdonald: look like sunjsk
>> gmcdonald: erm, sunjdk
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 5:13 PM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hey guys,
>>>
>>> Most of our CI build fail.
>>> IMHO, it's not relevant to use a CI system if we never take build
>>> results
>>> into account.
>>> Some users noticed that too, and we should fix that situation.
>>>
>>> So, I tried digging into continuum logs and fix all issues (as much as
>>> possible).
>>> To name but a few, i dug into an XMLInputFactory issue (thanks Thiago)
>>> recently introduced in the trunk.
>>>
>>> http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E17477_01/javaee/5/api/javax/xml/stream/XMLInputFactory.html
>>> http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E17409_01/javase/6/docs/api/javax/xml/stream/XMLInputFactory.html
>>>
>>> As described by the javadoc, #newFactory should be available in Java 6
>>> but
>>> actually, it appears only in a minor release.
>>>
>>> Anyway, I registered to Continuum in order to edit OpenEJB jobs. I was
>>> looking if we could easily switch to the latest VM.
>>>
>>> Daniel suggested to open the INFRA Jira against continuum. But before
>>> that,
>>> I want to be sure that the latest VM is not already installed.
>>>
>>> Can anyone give me rights to edit jobs?
>>>
>>> Your opinion is also welcome.
>>>
>>> Jean-Louis
>>>
>>> --
>>> View this message in context:
>>> http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Continuum-and-OpenEJB-tp2287580p2287580.html
>>> Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>
>>
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Continuum-and-OpenEJB-tp2287580p2289721.html
Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Reply via email to