Using Geronimo API/libraries sounds like a good thing to me cause we
have full control over them. Honestly it looks kind of strange to me
that the Sun JDK APIs are changing within a minor modification level
of the overall J2SE V6 release. I wonder whether an IBM JDK would
fully support the missing XMLInputFactory methods...

Cheers
Daniel

On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 6:48 PM, David Jencks <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Jul 13, 2010, at 8:13 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote:
>
>>
>> Hey guys,
>>
>> Most of our CI build fail.
>> IMHO, it's not relevant to use a CI system if we never take build results
>> into account.
>> Some users noticed that too, and we should fix that situation.
>>
>> So, I tried digging into continuum logs and fix all issues (as much as
>> possible).
>> To name but a few, i dug into an XMLInputFactory issue (thanks Thiago)
>> recently introduced in the trunk.
>>
>> http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E17477_01/javaee/5/api/javax/xml/stream/XMLInputFactory.html
>> http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E17409_01/javase/6/docs/api/javax/xml/stream/XMLInputFactory.html
>>
>> As described by the javadoc, #newFactory should be available in Java 6 but
>> actually, it appears only in a minor release.
>>
>> Anyway, I registered to Continuum in order to edit OpenEJB jobs. I was
>> looking if we could easily switch to the latest VM.
>
> For this particular issue maybe we should be compiling/using the geronimo 
> stax api and woodstox stax implementations?  Not sure how hard this is to set 
> up in maven.  There should be a couple other places where we need something 
> more advanced than the jvm, such as annotations 1.1.
>
> thanks
> david jencks
>
>>
>> Daniel suggested to open the INFRA Jira against continuum. But before that,
>> I want to be sure that the latest VM is not already installed.
>>
>> Can anyone give me rights to edit jobs?
>>
>> Your opinion is also welcome.
>>
>> Jean-Louis
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context: 
>> http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Continuum-and-OpenEJB-tp2287580p2287580.html
>> Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>

Reply via email to