maybe we can wait Jon talk (tuesday) before doing it? - Romain
2011/10/28 David Blevins <[email protected]> > We should probably yank the myfaces-api from the current javaee-api jar > snapshot. > > Seems this jar is really an implementation and if someone wanted to use a > different Faces implementation they would be unable to do so. > > > -David > > On Oct 28, 2011, at 12:53 PM, Matt Benson wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 2:46 PM, David Blevins <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Quick question on the org.apache.myfaces.core:myfaces-api jar. > >> > >> Is it tied to MyFaces in some way? Guessing the answer is, yes, as it > is labeled "myfaces-api" and not something more generic like "faces-api" > >> > >> If the answer is, no, then the follow up is how often does its contents > change? > >> > >> If it is stable and only changed once in a while, we might include it in > the javaee-api jar we produce from OpenEJB/TomEE. We don't include JavaMail > for example as it really isn't an API but an actual implementation. Seems > like that is the case here. > > > > Nail on the head and all that. :) > > > > Matt > > > >> > >> > >> -David > >> > >> > >
