Didn't seem there were any objections to yanking MyFaces API from the javaee-api jar. Speak up if you have other thoughts.
Will aim to release this tomorrow if possible. Happy to wait -- just say the word :) -David On Oct 28, 2011, at 1:47 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > maybe we can wait Jon talk (tuesday) before doing it? > > - Romain > > > 2011/10/28 David Blevins <[email protected]> > >> We should probably yank the myfaces-api from the current javaee-api jar >> snapshot. >> >> Seems this jar is really an implementation and if someone wanted to use a >> different Faces implementation they would be unable to do so. >> >> >> -David >> >> On Oct 28, 2011, at 12:53 PM, Matt Benson wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 2:46 PM, David Blevins <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>>> Quick question on the org.apache.myfaces.core:myfaces-api jar. >>>> >>>> Is it tied to MyFaces in some way? Guessing the answer is, yes, as it >> is labeled "myfaces-api" and not something more generic like "faces-api" >>>> >>>> If the answer is, no, then the follow up is how often does its contents >> change? >>>> >>>> If it is stable and only changed once in a while, we might include it in >> the javaee-api jar we produce from OpenEJB/TomEE. We don't include JavaMail >> for example as it really isn't an API but an actual implementation. Seems >> like that is the case here. >>> >>> Nail on the head and all that. :) >>> >>> Matt >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -David >>>> >>>> >> >>
