I like the JSR links, that's excellent. We can probably do that without the JSR numbers and instead just like "JavaServer Faces" etc. right to the JSR page.
The who implements what detail is maybe a bit distracting on that page and perhaps better left on a different page. Seeing so many project names on that page seems to take the focus off us. We could probably have a different page dedicated to the projects themselves. On Jan 16, 2012, at 12:02 PM, dsh wrote: > Btw, I intended the following navigation structure: > > 1) root > 1.1) root: TomEE >> comparison.html > 1.2) root: TomEE+ >> comparison.html > 1.3) root: OpenEJB >> comparison.html > 2) comparison > 2.1) comparison: TomEE >> apache-tomee.html > 2.2) comparison: TomEE+ >> apache-tomee.html > 2.3) comparison: OpenEJB >> documentation.html Maybe instead of that we can include links to the comparison on the apache-tomee.html and documentation.html. -David > On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 7:53 PM, dsh <[email protected]> wrote: >> Did a few table tweaks - I thought it would be helpful to have links >> to JSRs and the project implementing it available. >> >> -> http://people.apache.org/~dsh/oejbsite/comparison/comparison.html >> >> PS: align="absmiddle" doesn't seem to be valid HTML. Not sure where >> that comes from. >> >> Cheers >> Daniel >> >> On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 12:48 AM, David Blevins <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> On Jan 12, 2012, at 4:34 PM, David Blevins wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> On Jan 10, 2012, at 12:17 PM, dsh wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 from me too (I am good with either including or not including OEJB >>>>> in the comparison matrix). >>>> >>> [...] >>>> So any volunteers to throw up a little table that compares them by the >>>> Java EE specs they implement? >>> >>> Went ahead and did that. If people like it, I'll hook it up to the OpenEJB >>> button >>> >>> http://openejb.staging.apache.org/comparison.html >>> >>> Thoughts? >>> >>> -David >>>
