I put the complete set of figures online at p.a.o. -> http://people.apache.org/~dsh/oejbsite/figures/
Cheers Daniel On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 6:07 PM, dsh <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > for the article I did this figure to illustrate which project is > providing an implementation for which AIP. > > Cheers > Daniel > > On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 10:24 PM, David Blevins <[email protected]> > wrote: >> I like the JSR links, that's excellent. We can probably do that without the >> JSR numbers and instead just like "JavaServer Faces" etc. right to the JSR >> page. >> >> The who implements what detail is maybe a bit distracting on that page and >> perhaps better left on a different page. Seeing so many project names on >> that page seems to take the focus off us. We could probably have a >> different page dedicated to the projects themselves. >> >> On Jan 16, 2012, at 12:02 PM, dsh wrote: >> >>> Btw, I intended the following navigation structure: >>> >>> 1) root >>> 1.1) root: TomEE >> comparison.html >>> 1.2) root: TomEE+ >> comparison.html >>> 1.3) root: OpenEJB >> comparison.html >>> 2) comparison >>> 2.1) comparison: TomEE >> apache-tomee.html >>> 2.2) comparison: TomEE+ >> apache-tomee.html >>> 2.3) comparison: OpenEJB >> documentation.html >> >> Maybe instead of that we can include links to the comparison on the >> apache-tomee.html and documentation.html. >> >> >> -David >> >>> On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 7:53 PM, dsh <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Did a few table tweaks - I thought it would be helpful to have links >>>> to JSRs and the project implementing it available. >>>> >>>> -> http://people.apache.org/~dsh/oejbsite/comparison/comparison.html >>>> >>>> PS: align="absmiddle" doesn't seem to be valid HTML. Not sure where >>>> that comes from. >>>> >>>> Cheers >>>> Daniel >>>> >>>> On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 12:48 AM, David Blevins <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On Jan 12, 2012, at 4:34 PM, David Blevins wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Jan 10, 2012, at 12:17 PM, dsh wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> +1 from me too (I am good with either including or not including OEJB >>>>>>> in the comparison matrix). >>>>>> >>>>> [...] >>>>>> So any volunteers to throw up a little table that compares them by the >>>>>> Java EE specs they implement? >>>>> >>>>> Went ahead and did that. If people like it, I'll hook it up to the >>>>> OpenEJB button >>>>> >>>>> http://openejb.staging.apache.org/comparison.html >>>>> >>>>> Thoughts? >>>>> >>>>> -David >>>>> >>
