that sounds like a perfect fit!

LieGrue,
strub




>________________________________
> From: dsh <[email protected]>
>To: [email protected] 
>Sent: Saturday, May 5, 2012 9:18 AM
>Subject: Re: JAX-RS in Web Profile
> 
>If I got it correct Apache Wink is the JAX-RS portion that got
>extracted out of CXF [1] to become a new incubator project. It's being
>used inside WebSphere for instance.
>
>[1] http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/WinkProposal (current status)
>
>Cheers
>Daniel
>
>On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 2:28 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
><[email protected]> wrote:
>> Cxf is known (by us and moreover by users) and integration is done so i
>> think i prefer cxf.
>>
>> Cxf size is not an issue just the fact we have to manage two dependency
>> trees is se split jaxrs and jaxws would be a pain. If we use sthg else
>> that's close.
>>
>> Finally wink is based on cxf...
>>
>> - Romain
>> Le 5 mai 2012 01:40, "Aldrin Leal" <[email protected]> a écrit :
>>
>>> http://incubator.apache.org/wink/
>>>
>>> --
>>> -- Aldrin Leal, <[email protected]> / http://meadiciona.com/aldrinleal
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 8:26 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]
>>> >wrote:
>>>
>>> > Wink?
>>> >
>>> > - Romain
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > 2012/5/5 Aldrin Leal <[email protected]>
>>> >
>>> > > JAX-RS could be done with Wink as well. Does it sound like a fit?
>>> > >
>>> > > --
>>> > > -- Aldrin Leal, <[email protected]> /
>>> http://meadiciona.com/aldrinleal
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 4:36 PM, David Blevins <[email protected]
>>> > > >wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > > JAX-RS is being added to the Java EE 7 Web Profile.  Given that and
>>> the
>>> > > > fact that many of the recent user questions are about JAX-RS, perhaps
>>> > we
>>> > > > should consider adding it to our Web Profile distro now rather than
>>> > > later.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > The big question in my mind is, how small can we get it?  Can we do
>>> it
>>> > > > with CXF in a way that doesn't bring in JAX-WS?
>>> > > >
>>> > > > If we pull in JAX-WS too, then we have to certify it and that is a
>>> > major
>>> > > > effort.
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > > -David
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> >
>>>
>
>
>

Reply via email to