On May 6, 2012, at 3:00 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > if somebody wants to play with it: > https://gist.github.com/f8337f5824445932a515 > > i find wink less adapted than cxf > > look org.apache.wink.server.internal.handlers.InvokeMethodHandler for > instance which is not as adapted as cxf (we need to manage ejb and pojo so > 2 impl). We still can do it but we need more code where in cxf we tried to > remove our glue code to be able to update cxf versions easily. To change it > we need to change the conf (another thing we'll depend on) and where we'll > copy/paste the code...well IMO it doesn't look enough ready for us compared > to cxf where we just translate things.
Feel free to check that in. Worst case scenario we don't use it and eventually move it to the inactive modules. We haven't established how trimmed down the CXF JAX-RS support can be. Still curious about that myself. -David > 2012/5/5 Mark Struberg <[email protected]> > >> >> >> that sounds like a perfect fit! >> >> LieGrue, >> strub >> >> >> >> >>> ________________________________ >>> From: dsh <[email protected]> >>> To: [email protected] >>> Sent: Saturday, May 5, 2012 9:18 AM >>> Subject: Re: JAX-RS in Web Profile >>> >>> If I got it correct Apache Wink is the JAX-RS portion that got >>> extracted out of CXF [1] to become a new incubator project. It's being >>> used inside WebSphere for instance. >>> >>> [1] http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/WinkProposal (current status) >>> >>> Cheers >>> Daniel >>> >>> On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 2:28 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Cxf is known (by us and moreover by users) and integration is done so i >>>> think i prefer cxf. >>>> >>>> Cxf size is not an issue just the fact we have to manage two dependency >>>> trees is se split jaxrs and jaxws would be a pain. If we use sthg else >>>> that's close. >>>> >>>> Finally wink is based on cxf... >>>> >>>> - Romain >>>> Le 5 mai 2012 01:40, "Aldrin Leal" <[email protected]> a écrit : >>>> >>>>> http://incubator.apache.org/wink/ >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> -- Aldrin Leal, <[email protected]> / >> http://meadiciona.com/aldrinleal >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 8:26 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau < >> [email protected] >>>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Wink? >>>>>> >>>>>> - Romain >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> 2012/5/5 Aldrin Leal <[email protected]> >>>>>> >>>>>>> JAX-RS could be done with Wink as well. Does it sound like a fit? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> -- Aldrin Leal, <[email protected]> / >>>>> http://meadiciona.com/aldrinleal >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 4:36 PM, David Blevins < >> [email protected] >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> JAX-RS is being added to the Java EE 7 Web Profile. Given that >> and >>>>> the >>>>>>>> fact that many of the recent user questions are about JAX-RS, >> perhaps >>>>>> we >>>>>>>> should consider adding it to our Web Profile distro now rather >> than >>>>>>> later. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The big question in my mind is, how small can we get it? Can we >> do >>>>> it >>>>>>>> with CXF in a way that doesn't bring in JAX-WS? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> If we pull in JAX-WS too, then we have to certify it and that is >> a >>>>>> major >>>>>>>> effort. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -David >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> >>> >>
