commited - Romain
2012/5/7 David Blevins <[email protected]> > On May 6, 2012, at 3:00 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > > > if somebody wants to play with it: > > https://gist.github.com/f8337f5824445932a515 > > > > i find wink less adapted than cxf > > > > look org.apache.wink.server.internal.handlers.InvokeMethodHandler for > > instance which is not as adapted as cxf (we need to manage ejb and pojo > so > > 2 impl). We still can do it but we need more code where in cxf we tried > to > > remove our glue code to be able to update cxf versions easily. To change > it > > we need to change the conf (another thing we'll depend on) and where > we'll > > copy/paste the code...well IMO it doesn't look enough ready for us > compared > > to cxf where we just translate things. > > Feel free to check that in. > > Worst case scenario we don't use it and eventually move it to the inactive > modules. > > We haven't established how trimmed down the CXF JAX-RS support can be. > Still curious about that myself. > > -David > > > 2012/5/5 Mark Struberg <[email protected]> > > > >> > >> > >> that sounds like a perfect fit! > >> > >> LieGrue, > >> strub > >> > >> > >> > >> > >>> ________________________________ > >>> From: dsh <[email protected]> > >>> To: [email protected] > >>> Sent: Saturday, May 5, 2012 9:18 AM > >>> Subject: Re: JAX-RS in Web Profile > >>> > >>> If I got it correct Apache Wink is the JAX-RS portion that got > >>> extracted out of CXF [1] to become a new incubator project. It's being > >>> used inside WebSphere for instance. > >>> > >>> [1] http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/WinkProposal (current status) > >>> > >>> Cheers > >>> Daniel > >>> > >>> On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 2:28 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau > >>> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> Cxf is known (by us and moreover by users) and integration is done so > i > >>>> think i prefer cxf. > >>>> > >>>> Cxf size is not an issue just the fact we have to manage two > dependency > >>>> trees is se split jaxrs and jaxws would be a pain. If we use sthg else > >>>> that's close. > >>>> > >>>> Finally wink is based on cxf... > >>>> > >>>> - Romain > >>>> Le 5 mai 2012 01:40, "Aldrin Leal" <[email protected]> a écrit : > >>>> > >>>>> http://incubator.apache.org/wink/ > >>>>> > >>>>> -- > >>>>> -- Aldrin Leal, <[email protected]> / > >> http://meadiciona.com/aldrinleal > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 8:26 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau < > >> [email protected] > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> Wink? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> - Romain > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> 2012/5/5 Aldrin Leal <[email protected]> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> JAX-RS could be done with Wink as well. Does it sound like a fit? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>> -- Aldrin Leal, <[email protected]> / > >>>>> http://meadiciona.com/aldrinleal > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 4:36 PM, David Blevins < > >> [email protected] > >>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> JAX-RS is being added to the Java EE 7 Web Profile. Given that > >> and > >>>>> the > >>>>>>>> fact that many of the recent user questions are about JAX-RS, > >> perhaps > >>>>>> we > >>>>>>>> should consider adding it to our Web Profile distro now rather > >> than > >>>>>>> later. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> The big question in my mind is, how small can we get it? Can we > >> do > >>>>> it > >>>>>>>> with CXF in a way that doesn't bring in JAX-WS? > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> If we pull in JAX-WS too, then we have to certify it and that is > >> a > >>>>>> major > >>>>>>>> effort. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> -David > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >
