Donald, I noticed in the Release Notes that the 1.2.2 release is not mentioned as a previous release. I know this just came out last week, but should this be included? Would this change require a re-spin?
Other than that, the 2.0.0-beta artifacts and documentation look great! +1 Thanks! Kevin On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 10:58 PM, Donald Woods <[email protected]> wrote: > I've staged release candidate two for OpenJPA 2.0.0 Beta based on > r903062 of the following svn branch: > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openjpa/branches/2.0.0-beta/ > > Release Notes: > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openjpa/branches/2.0.0-beta/openjpa-project/RELEASE-NOTES.html?view=co > > Maven staging repo: > http://people.apache.org/~dwoods/openjpa/2.0.0-beta/staging-repo/<http://people.apache.org/%7Edwoods/openjpa/2.0.0-beta/staging-repo/> > > Site staging: > http://people.apache.org/~dwoods/openjpa/2.0.0-beta/staging-site/<http://people.apache.org/%7Edwoods/openjpa/2.0.0-beta/staging-site/> > > Distribution artifacts: > > http://people.apache.org/~dwoods/openjpa/2.0.0-beta/staging-site/apache-openjpa/downloads/<http://people.apache.org/%7Edwoods/openjpa/2.0.0-beta/staging-site/apache-openjpa/downloads/> > > User's Guide: > > http://people.apache.org/~dwoods/openjpa/2.0.0-beta/staging-site/apache-openjpa/docs/<http://people.apache.org/%7Edwoods/openjpa/2.0.0-beta/staging-site/apache-openjpa/docs/> > > API Docs: > http://people.apache.org/~dwoods/openjpa/2.0.0-beta/staging-site/apidocs/<http://people.apache.org/%7Edwoods/openjpa/2.0.0-beta/staging-site/apidocs/> > > > The RAT and IANAL build checks passed. > The openjpa-all problems have been fixed. > The build passed the JPA 2.0 TCK. > > > The vote will be open for 72 hours. > > [ ] +1 > [ ] 0 > [ ] -1 (and reason why) > > > Thanks, > Donald > >
