[X] +1 [ ] 0 [ ] -1 (and reason why) IMO, let's spend the time putting together the release announce page and news item. Additional items/issues/whatever can be doc'd there if we choose to do so. The feature list can also be polished for the announce. Check out the announce page for M3[1]. I'm assuming we'll do something similar for the beta.
-Jeremy [1] http://openjpa.apache.org/openjpa-200-milestone-3.html On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 1:00 PM, Kevin Sutter <[email protected]> wrote: > I agree with the sentiment that an undocumented feature really doesn't > exist. I use this reasoning all the time. But, to force a respin of the > Beta driver to document this osgi module seems like overkill. The worse > thing that happens is that people don't know it exists. We can resolve > that > with documentation in trunk and forum postings. > > Kevin > > On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 12:27 PM, Pinaki Poddar <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > Thanks for the comments, but I don't think any of the below requires a > > > new release candidate, given this is a Beta release :-) > > > > My only concern about openjpa-osgi module being added without a single > > mention. While OSGi-enablement of OpenJPA is a great addition (thanks to > > you), without any mention of such an important new feature does not do > > justice to the work. > > > > Of course, there are certain liberties with a Beta release. But adding a > > module without any mention does not fall into that category. > > > > ----- > > Pinaki > > -- > > View this message in context: > > > http://n2.nabble.com/VOTE-OpenJPA-2-0-0-beta-release-candidate-2-tp4458924p4462374.html > > Sent from the OpenJPA Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > >
