I think we should only be concentrated on last stable (2.4.x) and next one (3.x). Not seen any release of previous versions for a long time so not sure there is any interest to keep the branches active there.
Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Wordpress Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber <http://www.tomitribe.com> | JavaEE Factory <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> 2016-09-09 9:24 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg <[email protected]>: > The following versions are currently marked as 'open' in JIRA: > > 1.0.5 > 1.1.1 > 1.2.4 > > 1.3.0 > 2.0.2 > 2.0.3 > 2.1.2 > 2.2.1.1 > 2.2.3 > 2.3.1 > 2.2.x > 2.4.2 > 2.4.3 > 2.4.x2.5.0 > 3.0.0 > 3 > > > That's pretty confusing for our users. And also nasty when creating a bug. > > > So my proposal is to first collect the information about which versions we > like to maintain at all? > > I personally have interest in > > * 3.0.0 > * 2.4.2 > * the 2.* version IBM folks are maintaining (should be exactly 1 I guess) > > Please add to the list which version you do think we need as well. > > > > What do we do with the .x versions? > Remove them and move the fix-for to the next maintained version? > E.g. move 2.2.x tickets to 2.2.3 > > > Any ideas? >
