2016-09-09 10:02 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg <[email protected]>:
> I know that IBM is still using the 2.2.something branch. > > I would keep that version around as well, otherwise I agree with you. > > I'm happy with that if we get releases out, if not then that's in internal IBM fork and that's it no? > LieGrue, > strub > > > > > On Friday, 9 September 2016, 10:00, Romain Manni-Bucau < > [email protected]> wrote: > >I think we should only be concentrated on last stable (2.4.x) and next one > >(3.x). Not seen any release of previous versions for a long time so not > >sure there is any interest to keep the branches active there. > > > > > >Romain Manni-Bucau > >@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > ><https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Wordpress Blog > ><http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/ > rmannibucau> | > >LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber > ><http://www.tomitribe.com> | JavaEE Factory > ><https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> > > > > > >2016-09-09 9:24 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg <[email protected]>: > > > >> The following versions are currently marked as 'open' in JIRA: > >> > >> 1.0.5 > >> 1.1.1 > >> 1.2.4 > >> > >> 1.3.0 > >> 2.0.2 > >> 2.0.3 > >> 2.1.2 > >> 2.2.1.1 > >> 2.2.3 > >> 2.3.1 > >> 2.2.x > >> 2.4.2 > >> 2.4.3 > >> 2.4.x2.5.0 > >> 3.0.0 > >> 3 > >> > >> > >> That's pretty confusing for our users. And also nasty when creating a > bug. > >> > >> > >> So my proposal is to first collect the information about which versions > we > >> like to maintain at all? > >> > >> I personally have interest in > >> > >> * 3.0.0 > >> * 2.4.2 > >> * the 2.* version IBM folks are maintaining (should be exactly 1 I > guess) > >> > >> Please add to the list which version you do think we need as well. > >> > >> > >> > >> What do we do with the .x versions? > >> Remove them and move the fix-for to the next maintained version? > >> E.g. move 2.2.x tickets to 2.2.3 > >> > >> > >> Any ideas? > >> > > > > > > >
