I know that IBM is still using the 2.2.something branch. I would keep that version around as well, otherwise I agree with you.
LieGrue, strub On Friday, 9 September 2016, 10:00, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> wrote: >I think we should only be concentrated on last stable (2.4.x) and next one >(3.x). Not seen any release of previous versions for a long time so not >sure there is any interest to keep the branches active there. > > >Romain Manni-Bucau >@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog ><https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Wordpress Blog ><http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | >LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber ><http://www.tomitribe.com> | JavaEE Factory ><https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> > > >2016-09-09 9:24 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg <[email protected]>: > >> The following versions are currently marked as 'open' in JIRA: >> >> 1.0.5 >> 1.1.1 >> 1.2.4 >> >> 1.3.0 >> 2.0.2 >> 2.0.3 >> 2.1.2 >> 2.2.1.1 >> 2.2.3 >> 2.3.1 >> 2.2.x >> 2.4.2 >> 2.4.3 >> 2.4.x2.5.0 >> 3.0.0 >> 3 >> >> >> That's pretty confusing for our users. And also nasty when creating a bug. >> >> >> So my proposal is to first collect the information about which versions we >> like to maintain at all? >> >> I personally have interest in >> >> * 3.0.0 >> * 2.4.2 >> * the 2.* version IBM folks are maintaining (should be exactly 1 I guess) >> >> Please add to the list which version you do think we need as well. >> >> >> >> What do we do with the .x versions? >> Remove them and move the fix-for to the next maintained version? >> E.g. move 2.2.x tickets to 2.2.3 >> >> >> Any ideas? >> > > >
