Hi Heath! I know that those versions are still used in production
But are those versions still all get a 'fixed-in' flag? ^^ I mean do you think that we at ASF will ever do a release for those versions again? We will of course keep the branches, but will we really do a release? Probably for 2.2.3, but the rest? In any case we could then at least ditch the following versions 1.0.5 1.1.1 1.3.0 2.0.3 2.3.1 2.2.x 2.4.3 2.4.x 2.5.0 3 LieGrue, strub > On Tuesday, 13 September 2016, 17:56, Heath Thomann <[email protected]> > wrote: > > HI! This question seems to be related, or at least in the same vein, as > OPENJPA-2628, right? Personally (eeeeerrr, professionally) the branches I > care most about are 1.2.4, 2.0.2, 2.1.2, 2.2.1.1, 2.2.3. I agree that all > those older version number are starting to make things very bloated. > > Thanks, > > Heath > > > On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 2:23 AM, Francesco Chicchiriccò > <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> On 09/09/2016 10:03, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: >> >>> 2016-09-09 10:02 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg > <[email protected]>: >>> >>> I know that IBM is still using the 2.2.something branch. >>>> >>>> I would keep that version around as well, otherwise I agree with > you. >>>> >>>> >>>> I'm happy with that if we get releases out, if not then > that's in >>> internal >>> IBM fork and that's it no? >>> >> >> Hi, >> I tend to agree with Romain: let's stick with 2.4.2 and 3.0.0 >> >> Regards. >> >> >> On Friday, 9 September 2016, 10:00, Romain Manni-Bucau < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> I think we should only be concentrated on last stable (2.4.x) and > next >>>>> one >>>>> (3.x). Not seen any release of previous versions for a long > time so not >>>>> sure there is any interest to keep the branches active there. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau >>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog >>>>> <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Wordpress > Blog >>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github > <https://github.com/ >>>>> >>>> rmannibucau> | >>>> >>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | > Tomitriber >>>>> <http://www.tomitribe.com> | JavaEE Factory >>>>> <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> 2016-09-09 9:24 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg > <[email protected]>: >>>>> >>>>> The following versions are currently marked as 'open' > in JIRA: >>>>>> >>>>>> 1.0.5 >>>>>> 1.1.1 >>>>>> 1.2.4 >>>>>> >>>>>> 1.3.0 >>>>>> 2.0.2 >>>>>> 2.0.3 >>>>>> 2.1.2 >>>>>> 2.2.1.1 >>>>>> 2.2.3 >>>>>> 2.3.1 >>>>>> 2.2.x >>>>>> 2.4.2 >>>>>> 2.4.3 >>>>>> 2.4.x2.5.0 >>>>>> 3.0.0 >>>>>> 3 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> That's pretty confusing for our users. And also nasty > when creating a >>>>>> bug. >>>>>> >>>>>> So my proposal is to first collect the information about > which >>>>>> versions we like to maintain at all? >>>>>> >>>>>> I personally have interest in >>>>>> >>>>>> * 3.0.0 >>>>>> * 2.4.2 >>>>>> * the 2.* version IBM folks are maintaining (should be > exactly 1 I >>>>>> guess) >>>>>> Please add to the list which version you do think we need > as well. >>>>>> >>>>>> What do we do with the .x versions? >>>>>> Remove them and move the fix-for to the next maintained > version? >>>>>> E.g. move 2.2.x tickets to 2.2.3 >>>>>> >>>>>> Any ideas? >>>>>> >>>>> >> -- >> Francesco Chicchiriccò >> >> Tirasa - Open Source Excellence >> http://www.tirasa.net/ >> >> Involved at The Apache Software Foundation: >> member, Syncope PMC chair, Cocoon PMC, Olingo PMC, >> CXF Committer, OpenJPA Committer, PonyMail PPMC >> http://home.apache.org/~ilgrosso/ >> >> >
