1) and 2) are done
here is the example of ant target modified to use 4.9.5 compiler and
resulting "BUILD SUCCESSFUL" (32-bit JDK only)
<target name="compile.laszlo.networktesting.debug" depends="*
-retrieve-openlaszlo46*">
<antcall target="-compile.flash" inheritAll="true" inheritRefs="true">
<param name="flash.classpath.ref" value="*laszlo46.lib*" />
<param name="flash.src.dir" value="${laszlo.as3.src.dir}/networkTesting" />
<param name="flash.lps.home" value="${*laszlo46.home*}" />
<param name="flash.runtime" value="*swf11*" />
<param name="flash.main.file" value="networktesting.lzx" />
<param name="flash.out.file" value="*networktestingdebug.swf11.swf*" />
<param name="flash.debug" value="--debug" />
</antcall>
</target>
highlighted are parts necessary to use Flex 4.6
In effect since rev. 1446514
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 5:56 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]>wrote:
> According to this:
> http://www.openlaszlo.org/pipermail/laszlo-dev/2012-July/024933.html
>
> we going to be limited on 32bit JDK :(
>
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 5:41 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> Flex 4.6 is not included into openlaszlo 5.0. Will use 4.9.5.
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 1:47 PM, Maxim Solodovnik
>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>> ok
>>> I'll check and send you results of this investigation
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 1:45 PM, [email protected] <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I think we need Flex 4.6.
>>>> It could be that still this is our branch to use:
>>>> http://svn.openlaszlo.org/openlaszlo/branches/flex4.6/
>>>>
>>>> And as far as I know this branch is a 1:1 copy of the 4.9.5 release.
>>>>
>>>> But lets check OpenLaszlo trunk, maybe somebody has made the changes
>>>> needed to have swf11 and flex 4.6 available.
>>>>
>>>> Sebastian
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2013/2/15 [email protected] <[email protected]>
>>>>
>>>> Plz check what SDK is used internally / what Flex (what version of
>>>>> mxmlc.jar) compiler is used?
>>>>> It might happen that this does not even compile to SWF11.
>>>>> My Internet is currently pretty slow, sorry it would take a while to
>>>>> check that here.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>> Sebastian
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 2013/2/15 Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]>
>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.openlaszlo.org/download
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> OpenLaszlo Latest Nightly Builds
>>>>>> points to 5.0b2
>>>>>> I'll use it
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 1:12 PM, [email protected] <
>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ah sure Raju has set up a new repository.
>>>>>>> If there is a nightly build from that we should use it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Can you please post the link to it?
>>>>>>> I guess you need a nightly build, building OpenLaszlo from source is
>>>>>>> not so straightforward ... you need a lot of special tools. actually
>>>>>>> without OSX its almost impossible (except you are a cygwin geek)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sebastian
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2013/2/15 Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I googled openlaszlo swf 11 and get the post regarding latest
>>>>>>>> openlaszlo from git
>>>>>>>> it is 5.0 currently
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 12:59 PM, [email protected] <
>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Good question.
>>>>>>>>> Basically we have that 4.9.5 version from Raju which is using the
>>>>>>>>> needed flex SDK internally.
>>>>>>>>> I don't know if those changes ever made it into the 5.0 Version,
>>>>>>>>> espacially which flex SDK 5.0 is using internally.
>>>>>>>>> If 5.0 uses a newer SDK and supports swf11 we should use it.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Seb
>>>>>>>>> Am 15.02.2013 18:28 schrieb "Maxim Solodovnik" <
>>>>>>>>> [email protected]>:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Should openlaszlo 4.9.5 or 5.0 should be used?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 10:50 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> OK I'll handle 1 and 2 today (or tonight :) )
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 10:48 AM, [email protected] <
>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> From my perspective we need to do the following:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 1) add openlaszlo 4.9.5 to our ivy list to have both runtime
>>>>>>>>>>>> environments: 4.9 and 4.9.5
>>>>>>>>>>>> Question: How will ivy behave when you want / force both
>>>>>>>>>>>> versions? Cause I can imagine Ivy will think that 4.9.5 is
>>>>>>>>>>>> sufficient to
>>>>>>>>>>>> download.
>>>>>>>>>>>> But we need also version 4.9 because 4.9.5 does not SWF8 file
>>>>>>>>>>>> format anymore.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Any ideas on that?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> My roughest idea would be to rename the entire .tgz file so
>>>>>>>>>>>> that it will treat it as if those or completely different packages.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 2) And then we need to refactor the build.xml to have two
>>>>>>>>>>>> openlaszlo directories (laszlo.home) options.
>>>>>>>>>>>> So when compiling the SWF8 stuff it will use openlaszlo4.9 and
>>>>>>>>>>>> when it compiles to SWF11 it will use openlaszlo 4.9.5
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 3) We need to refactor the Audio/Video components. Basically
>>>>>>>>>>>> in editRecordStreamSWF10.lzx line 240 "getMicrophone" has to be
>>>>>>>>>>>> replaced with: "getEnhancedMicrophone"
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://help.adobe.com/en_US/FlashPlatform/reference/actionscript/3/flash/media/Microphone.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> And there has to be checked which of those config values are
>>>>>>>>>>>> valid (or which ones are important to be added). Cause enhanced
>>>>>>>>>>>> microphones
>>>>>>>>>>>> have a different option set.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Some of those new variables should be made available through
>>>>>>>>>>>> the config.xml (and old ones removed).
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> @Maxim: If you could take care about 1) + 2) I would be really
>>>>>>>>>>>> thankful. Issue 3) is basically something I have been testing
>>>>>>>>>>>> already.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>>>>>>> Sebastian
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> Sebastian Wagner
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.webbase-design.de
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> WBR
>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> WBR
>>>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> WBR
>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Sebastian Wagner
>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
>>>>>>> http://www.webbase-design.de
>>>>>>> http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> WBR
>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Sebastian Wagner
>>>>> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
>>>>> http://www.webbase-design.de
>>>>> http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Sebastian Wagner
>>>> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
>>>> http://www.webbase-design.de
>>>> http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
>>>> [email protected]
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> WBR
>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> WBR
>> Maxim aka solomax
>>
>
>
>
> --
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax
>
--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax
