Thanks! I will test later today.
Sebastian
Am 16.02.2013 00:18 schrieb "Maxim Solodovnik" <[email protected]>:
> 1) and 2) are done
>
> here is the example of ant target modified to use 4.9.5 compiler and
> resulting "BUILD SUCCESSFUL" (32-bit JDK only)
>
> <target name="compile.laszlo.networktesting.debug" depends="*
> -retrieve-openlaszlo46*">
> <antcall target="-compile.flash" inheritAll="true" inheritRefs="true">
> <param name="flash.classpath.ref" value="*laszlo46.lib*" />
> <param name="flash.src.dir" value="${laszlo.as3.src.dir}/networkTesting" />
> <param name="flash.lps.home" value="${*laszlo46.home*}" />
> <param name="flash.runtime" value="*swf11*" />
> <param name="flash.main.file" value="networktesting.lzx" />
> <param name="flash.out.file" value="*networktestingdebug.swf11.swf*" />
> <param name="flash.debug" value="--debug" />
> </antcall>
> </target>
>
> highlighted are parts necessary to use Flex 4.6
> In effect since rev. 1446514
>
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 5:56 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> According to this:
>> http://www.openlaszlo.org/pipermail/laszlo-dev/2012-July/024933.html
>>
>> we going to be limited on 32bit JDK :(
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 5:41 PM, Maxim Solodovnik
>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>> Flex 4.6 is not included into openlaszlo 5.0. Will use 4.9.5.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 1:47 PM, Maxim Solodovnik
>>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>
>>>> ok
>>>> I'll check and send you results of this investigation
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 1:45 PM, [email protected] <
>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I think we need Flex 4.6.
>>>>> It could be that still this is our branch to use:
>>>>> http://svn.openlaszlo.org/openlaszlo/branches/flex4.6/
>>>>>
>>>>> And as far as I know this branch is a 1:1 copy of the 4.9.5 release.
>>>>>
>>>>> But lets check OpenLaszlo trunk, maybe somebody has made the changes
>>>>> needed to have swf11 and flex 4.6 available.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sebastian
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 2013/2/15 [email protected] <[email protected]>
>>>>>
>>>>> Plz check what SDK is used internally / what Flex (what version of
>>>>>> mxmlc.jar) compiler is used?
>>>>>> It might happen that this does not even compile to SWF11.
>>>>>> My Internet is currently pretty slow, sorry it would take a while to
>>>>>> check that here.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>> Sebastian
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2013/2/15 Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.openlaszlo.org/download
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> OpenLaszlo Latest Nightly Builds
>>>>>>> points to 5.0b2
>>>>>>> I'll use it
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 1:12 PM, [email protected] <
>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ah sure Raju has set up a new repository.
>>>>>>>> If there is a nightly build from that we should use it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Can you please post the link to it?
>>>>>>>> I guess you need a nightly build, building OpenLaszlo from source
>>>>>>>> is not so straightforward ... you need a lot of special tools. actually
>>>>>>>> without OSX its almost impossible (except you are a cygwin geek)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Sebastian
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 2013/2/15 Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I googled openlaszlo swf 11 and get the post regarding latest
>>>>>>>>> openlaszlo from git
>>>>>>>>> it is 5.0 currently
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 12:59 PM, [email protected] <
>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Good question.
>>>>>>>>>> Basically we have that 4.9.5 version from Raju which is using the
>>>>>>>>>> needed flex SDK internally.
>>>>>>>>>> I don't know if those changes ever made it into the 5.0 Version,
>>>>>>>>>> espacially which flex SDK 5.0 is using internally.
>>>>>>>>>> If 5.0 uses a newer SDK and supports swf11 we should use it.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Seb
>>>>>>>>>> Am 15.02.2013 18:28 schrieb "Maxim Solodovnik" <
>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]>:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Should openlaszlo 4.9.5 or 5.0 should be used?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 10:50 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> OK I'll handle 1 and 2 today (or tonight :) )
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 10:48 AM, [email protected] <
>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> From my perspective we need to do the following:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1) add openlaszlo 4.9.5 to our ivy list to have both runtime
>>>>>>>>>>>>> environments: 4.9 and 4.9.5
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Question: How will ivy behave when you want / force both
>>>>>>>>>>>>> versions? Cause I can imagine Ivy will think that 4.9.5 is
>>>>>>>>>>>>> sufficient to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> download.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> But we need also version 4.9 because 4.9.5 does not SWF8 file
>>>>>>>>>>>>> format anymore.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any ideas on that?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> My roughest idea would be to rename the entire .tgz file so
>>>>>>>>>>>>> that it will treat it as if those or completely different
>>>>>>>>>>>>> packages.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2) And then we need to refactor the build.xml to have two
>>>>>>>>>>>>> openlaszlo directories (laszlo.home) options.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> So when compiling the SWF8 stuff it will use openlaszlo4.9 and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> when it compiles to SWF11 it will use openlaszlo 4.9.5
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3) We need to refactor the Audio/Video components. Basically
>>>>>>>>>>>>> in editRecordStreamSWF10.lzx line 240 "getMicrophone" has to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> be replaced with: "getEnhancedMicrophone"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://help.adobe.com/en_US/FlashPlatform/reference/actionscript/3/flash/media/Microphone.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> And there has to be checked which of those config values are
>>>>>>>>>>>>> valid (or which ones are important to be added). Cause enhanced
>>>>>>>>>>>>> microphones
>>>>>>>>>>>>> have a different option set.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Some of those new variables should be made available through
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the config.xml (and old ones removed).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> @Maxim: If you could take care about 1) + 2) I would be really
>>>>>>>>>>>>> thankful. Issue 3) is basically something I have been testing
>>>>>>>>>>>>> already.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sebastian
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sebastian Wagner
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.webbase-design.de
>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> WBR
>>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> WBR
>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> WBR
>>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Sebastian Wagner
>>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
>>>>>>>> http://www.webbase-design.de
>>>>>>>> http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> WBR
>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Sebastian Wagner
>>>>>> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
>>>>>> http://www.webbase-design.de
>>>>>> http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Sebastian Wagner
>>>>> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
>>>>> http://www.webbase-design.de
>>>>> http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> WBR
>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> WBR
>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> WBR
>> Maxim aka solomax
>>
>
>
>
> --
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax
>
