If I modify the needed audio/video components I do receive this error
during build.
-compile.flash:
[java] Compiling: main.as3.lzx to maindebug.as3.swf11.swf
[java] Exception in thread "main"
org.openlaszlo.utils.ChainedException: org.openlaszlo.sc.CompilerError:
Error running external compiler: java.io.IOException: Cannot run program
"/Users/swagner/Documents/workspaces/openmeetings_zz/Openmeetings/build/openlaszlo46/WEB-INF/flexsdk/4.6.0/bin/mxmlc":
error=13, Permission denied
[java] at
org.openlaszlo.compiler.SWF9Writer.finish(SWF9Writer.java:561)
[java] at
org.openlaszlo.compiler.ObjectWriter.finish(ObjectWriter.java:536)
[java] at
org.openlaszlo.compiler.Compiler.compile(Compiler.java:485)
[java] at
org.openlaszlo.compiler.Compiler.compile(Compiler.java:210)
[java] at org.openlaszlo.compiler.Main.compile(Main.java:408)
[java] at org.openlaszlo.compiler.Main.lzc(Main.java:348)
[java] at org.openlaszlo.compiler.Main.main(Main.java:109)
[java] Caused by: org.openlaszlo.sc.CompilerError: Error running
external compiler: java.io.IOException: Cannot run program
"/Users/swagner/Documents/workspaces/openmeetings_zz/Openmeetings/build/openlaszlo46/WEB-INF/flexsdk/4.6.0/bin/mxmlc":
error=13, Permission denied
[java] at
org.openlaszlo.sc.SWF9Generator.callFlexCompiler(SWF9Generator.java:1204)
[java] at
org.openlaszlo.sc.SWF10Compiler.finishApp(SWF10Compiler.java:70)
[java] at
org.openlaszlo.compiler.SWF9Writer.finish(SWF9Writer.java:545)
[java] ... 6 more
[java] Caused by: org.openlaszlo.sc.CompilerError: Error running
external compiler: java.io.IOException: Cannot run program
"/Users/swagner/Documents/workspaces/openmeetings_zz/Openmeetings/build/openlaszlo46/WEB-INF/flexsdk/4.6.0/bin/mxmlc":
error=13, Permission denied
[java] at
org.openlaszlo.sc.SWF9Generator.callFlexCompiler(SWF9Generator.java:1204)
[java] at
org.openlaszlo.sc.SWF10Compiler.finishApp(SWF10Compiler.java:70)
[java] at
org.openlaszlo.compiler.SWF9Writer.finish(SWF9Writer.java:545)
[java] at
org.openlaszlo.compiler.ObjectWriter.finish(ObjectWriter.java:536)
[java] at
org.openlaszlo.compiler.Compiler.compile(Compiler.java:485)
[java] at
org.openlaszlo.compiler.Compiler.compile(Compiler.java:210)
[java] at org.openlaszlo.compiler.Main.compile(Main.java:408)
[java] at org.openlaszlo.compiler.Main.lzc(Main.java:348)
[java] at org.openlaszlo.compiler.Main.main(Main.java:109)
BUILD FAILED
My modified build.xml looks like this:
<target name="compile.laszlo.main.as3"
depends="compile.laszlo.main.debug.as3">
<antcall target="-compile.flash" inheritAll="true"
inheritRefs="true">
<param name="flash.classpath.ref" value="laszlo46.lib" />
<param name="flash.src.dir" value="${laszlo.as3.src.dir}" />
<param name="flash.lps.home" value="${laszlo46.home}" />
<param name="flash.runtime" value="swf11" />
<param name="flash.main.file" value="main.as3.lzx" />
<param name="flash.out.file" value="main.as3.swf11.swf" />
<param name="flash.debug" value="" />
</antcall>
</target>
<target name="compile.laszlo.main.debug.as3"
depends="-retrieve-openlaszlo46">
<antcall target="-compile.flash" inheritAll="true"
inheritRefs="true">
<param name="flash.classpath.ref" value="laszlo46.lib" />
<param name="flash.src.dir" value="${laszlo.as3.src.dir}" />
<param name="flash.lps.home" value="${laszlo46.home}" />
<param name="flash.runtime" value="swf11" />
<param name="flash.main.file" value="main.as3.lzx" />
<param name="flash.out.file" value="maindebug.as3.swf11.swf" />
<param name="flash.debug" value="--debug" />
</antcall>
</target>
I think the XML is correct, the paths point to valid files but I wonder why
the SWF11 compilation has this issue. I never saw this happen in SWF10 and
the 4.5 SDK.
After doing a manual: chmod +x
/Users/swagner/Documents/workspaces/openmeetings_zz/Openmeetings/build/openlaszlo46/WEB-INF/flexsdk/4.6.0/bin/mxmlc
Everything seems to be fine.
Sebastian
2013/2/16 [email protected] <[email protected]>
> Thanks! I will test later today.
>
> Sebastian
> Am 16.02.2013 00:18 schrieb "Maxim Solodovnik" <[email protected]>:
>
> 1) and 2) are done
>>
>> here is the example of ant target modified to use 4.9.5 compiler and
>> resulting "BUILD SUCCESSFUL" (32-bit JDK only)
>>
>> <target name="compile.laszlo.networktesting.debug" depends="*
>> -retrieve-openlaszlo46*">
>> <antcall target="-compile.flash" inheritAll="true" inheritRefs="true">
>> <param name="flash.classpath.ref" value="*laszlo46.lib*" />
>> <param name="flash.src.dir" value="${laszlo.as3.src.dir}/networkTesting"
>> />
>> <param name="flash.lps.home" value="${*laszlo46.home*}" />
>> <param name="flash.runtime" value="*swf11*" />
>> <param name="flash.main.file" value="networktesting.lzx" />
>> <param name="flash.out.file" value="*networktestingdebug.swf11.swf*" />
>> <param name="flash.debug" value="--debug" />
>> </antcall>
>> </target>
>>
>> highlighted are parts necessary to use Flex 4.6
>> In effect since rev. 1446514
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 5:56 PM, Maxim Solodovnik
>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>> According to this:
>>> http://www.openlaszlo.org/pipermail/laszlo-dev/2012-July/024933.html
>>>
>>> we going to be limited on 32bit JDK :(
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 5:41 PM, Maxim Solodovnik
>>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Flex 4.6 is not included into openlaszlo 5.0. Will use 4.9.5.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 1:47 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> ok
>>>>> I'll check and send you results of this investigation
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 1:45 PM, [email protected] <
>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I think we need Flex 4.6.
>>>>>> It could be that still this is our branch to use:
>>>>>> http://svn.openlaszlo.org/openlaszlo/branches/flex4.6/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And as far as I know this branch is a 1:1 copy of the 4.9.5 release.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But lets check OpenLaszlo trunk, maybe somebody has made the changes
>>>>>> needed to have swf11 and flex 4.6 available.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sebastian
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2013/2/15 [email protected] <[email protected]>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Plz check what SDK is used internally / what Flex (what version of
>>>>>>> mxmlc.jar) compiler is used?
>>>>>>> It might happen that this does not even compile to SWF11.
>>>>>>> My Internet is currently pretty slow, sorry it would take a while to
>>>>>>> check that here.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>> Sebastian
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2013/2/15 Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://www.openlaszlo.org/download
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> OpenLaszlo Latest Nightly Builds
>>>>>>>> points to 5.0b2
>>>>>>>> I'll use it
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 1:12 PM, [email protected] <
>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ah sure Raju has set up a new repository.
>>>>>>>>> If there is a nightly build from that we should use it.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Can you please post the link to it?
>>>>>>>>> I guess you need a nightly build, building OpenLaszlo from source
>>>>>>>>> is not so straightforward ... you need a lot of special tools.
>>>>>>>>> actually
>>>>>>>>> without OSX its almost impossible (except you are a cygwin geek)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Sebastian
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 2013/2/15 Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I googled openlaszlo swf 11 and get the post regarding latest
>>>>>>>>>> openlaszlo from git
>>>>>>>>>> it is 5.0 currently
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 12:59 PM, [email protected] <
>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Good question.
>>>>>>>>>>> Basically we have that 4.9.5 version from Raju which is using
>>>>>>>>>>> the needed flex SDK internally.
>>>>>>>>>>> I don't know if those changes ever made it into the 5.0 Version,
>>>>>>>>>>> espacially which flex SDK 5.0 is using internally.
>>>>>>>>>>> If 5.0 uses a newer SDK and supports swf11 we should use it.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Seb
>>>>>>>>>>> Am 15.02.2013 18:28 schrieb "Maxim Solodovnik" <
>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]>:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Should openlaszlo 4.9.5 or 5.0 should be used?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 10:50 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> OK I'll handle 1 and 2 today (or tonight :) )
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 10:48 AM, [email protected] <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From my perspective we need to do the following:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1) add openlaszlo 4.9.5 to our ivy list to have both runtime
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> environments: 4.9 and 4.9.5
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Question: How will ivy behave when you want / force both
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> versions? Cause I can imagine Ivy will think that 4.9.5 is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sufficient to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> download.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But we need also version 4.9 because 4.9.5 does not SWF8 file
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> format anymore.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any ideas on that?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My roughest idea would be to rename the entire .tgz file so
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that it will treat it as if those or completely different
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> packages.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2) And then we need to refactor the build.xml to have two
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> openlaszlo directories (laszlo.home) options.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So when compiling the SWF8 stuff it will use openlaszlo4.9
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and when it compiles to SWF11 it will use openlaszlo 4.9.5
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3) We need to refactor the Audio/Video components. Basically
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in editRecordStreamSWF10.lzx line 240 "getMicrophone" has to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be replaced with: "getEnhancedMicrophone"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://help.adobe.com/en_US/FlashPlatform/reference/actionscript/3/flash/media/Microphone.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And there has to be checked which of those config values are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> valid (or which ones are important to be added). Cause enhanced
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> microphones
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have a different option set.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Some of those new variables should be made available through
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the config.xml (and old ones removed).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @Maxim: If you could take care about 1) + 2) I would be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> really thankful. Issue 3) is basically something I have been
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> testing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> already.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sebastian
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sebastian Wagner
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.webbase-design.de
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>> WBR
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> WBR
>>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> WBR
>>>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Sebastian Wagner
>>>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
>>>>>>>>> http://www.webbase-design.de
>>>>>>>>> http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> WBR
>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Sebastian Wagner
>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
>>>>>>> http://www.webbase-design.de
>>>>>>> http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Sebastian Wagner
>>>>>> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
>>>>>> http://www.webbase-design.de
>>>>>> http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> WBR
>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> WBR
>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> WBR
>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> WBR
>> Maxim aka solomax
>>
>
--
Sebastian Wagner
https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
http://www.webbase-design.de
http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
[email protected]
