ok let it have the same name :)
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 10:48 AM, [email protected] < [email protected]> wrote: > Sure, > > I basically don't mind what name the SWFs have. > Just think its handy to know what version of the file you are looking at. > Cause if all files have the same name ... you basically see no difference > in the binary file if its SWF8, SWF10 or SWF11 and the Flash player will > provide you with no tools to see what SWF format you are looking at. > > There are of course some ways to find it out, but they are really odd ... > like counting some bytes in the sequence of the binary file and stuff like > that... > > Sebastian > > > 2013/2/17 Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]> > >> I simply mean we have very long file names need to be changed all the >> time ... >> it was main.as3.swf10.swf/maindebug.as3.swf10.swf, now it is >> maindebug.as3.swf11.swf/maindebug.as3.swf11.swf >> maybe it is time to create files with short constant names for swf11 and >> leave *swf8* long and ugly :) >> >> >> On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 10:23 AM, [email protected] < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> *Maybe it is time to compile it to the maindebug.swf, main.swf, etc?* >>> What do you mean by that? The SWF8 apps won't simply compile to >>> SWF11/ActionScript3 just by changing the build target. That is why we have >>> two SWFs and not a single one. >>> >>> Sebastian >>> >>> >>> 2013/2/17 Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]> >>> >>>> Maybe it is time to compile it to the maindebug.swf, main.swf, etc? >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 4:55 AM, [email protected] < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> The new debug URL is now: >>>>> http://localhost:5080/openmeetings/?swf=maindebug.as3.swf11.swf >>>>> >>>>> Sebastian >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> 2013/2/17 [email protected] <[email protected]> >>>>> >>>>> If I modify the needed audio/video components I do receive this error >>>>>> during build. >>>>>> >>>>>> -compile.flash: >>>>>> [java] Compiling: main.as3.lzx to maindebug.as3.swf11.swf >>>>>> [java] Exception in thread "main" >>>>>> org.openlaszlo.utils.ChainedException: org.openlaszlo.sc.CompilerError: >>>>>> Error running external compiler: java.io.IOException: Cannot run program >>>>>> "/Users/swagner/Documents/workspaces/openmeetings_zz/Openmeetings/build/openlaszlo46/WEB-INF/flexsdk/4.6.0/bin/mxmlc": >>>>>> error=13, Permission denied >>>>>> [java] at >>>>>> org.openlaszlo.compiler.SWF9Writer.finish(SWF9Writer.java:561) >>>>>> [java] at >>>>>> org.openlaszlo.compiler.ObjectWriter.finish(ObjectWriter.java:536) >>>>>> [java] at >>>>>> org.openlaszlo.compiler.Compiler.compile(Compiler.java:485) >>>>>> [java] at >>>>>> org.openlaszlo.compiler.Compiler.compile(Compiler.java:210) >>>>>> [java] at org.openlaszlo.compiler.Main.compile(Main.java:408) >>>>>> [java] at org.openlaszlo.compiler.Main.lzc(Main.java:348) >>>>>> [java] at org.openlaszlo.compiler.Main.main(Main.java:109) >>>>>> [java] Caused by: org.openlaszlo.sc.CompilerError: Error running >>>>>> external compiler: java.io.IOException: Cannot run program >>>>>> "/Users/swagner/Documents/workspaces/openmeetings_zz/Openmeetings/build/openlaszlo46/WEB-INF/flexsdk/4.6.0/bin/mxmlc": >>>>>> error=13, Permission denied >>>>>> [java] at >>>>>> org.openlaszlo.sc.SWF9Generator.callFlexCompiler(SWF9Generator.java:1204) >>>>>> [java] at >>>>>> org.openlaszlo.sc.SWF10Compiler.finishApp(SWF10Compiler.java:70) >>>>>> [java] at >>>>>> org.openlaszlo.compiler.SWF9Writer.finish(SWF9Writer.java:545) >>>>>> [java] ... 6 more >>>>>> [java] Caused by: org.openlaszlo.sc.CompilerError: Error running >>>>>> external compiler: java.io.IOException: Cannot run program >>>>>> "/Users/swagner/Documents/workspaces/openmeetings_zz/Openmeetings/build/openlaszlo46/WEB-INF/flexsdk/4.6.0/bin/mxmlc": >>>>>> error=13, Permission denied >>>>>> [java] at >>>>>> org.openlaszlo.sc.SWF9Generator.callFlexCompiler(SWF9Generator.java:1204) >>>>>> [java] at >>>>>> org.openlaszlo.sc.SWF10Compiler.finishApp(SWF10Compiler.java:70) >>>>>> [java] at >>>>>> org.openlaszlo.compiler.SWF9Writer.finish(SWF9Writer.java:545) >>>>>> [java] at >>>>>> org.openlaszlo.compiler.ObjectWriter.finish(ObjectWriter.java:536) >>>>>> [java] at >>>>>> org.openlaszlo.compiler.Compiler.compile(Compiler.java:485) >>>>>> [java] at >>>>>> org.openlaszlo.compiler.Compiler.compile(Compiler.java:210) >>>>>> [java] at org.openlaszlo.compiler.Main.compile(Main.java:408) >>>>>> [java] at org.openlaszlo.compiler.Main.lzc(Main.java:348) >>>>>> [java] at org.openlaszlo.compiler.Main.main(Main.java:109) >>>>>> >>>>>> BUILD FAILED >>>>>> >>>>>> My modified build.xml looks like this: >>>>>> <target name="compile.laszlo.main.as3" >>>>>> depends="compile.laszlo.main.debug.as3"> >>>>>> >>>>>> <antcall target="-compile.flash" inheritAll="true" >>>>>> inheritRefs="true"> >>>>>> <param name="flash.classpath.ref" value="laszlo46.lib" /> >>>>>> <param name="flash.src.dir" value="${laszlo.as3.src.dir}" >>>>>> /> >>>>>> >>>>>> <param name="flash.lps.home" value="${laszlo46.home}" /> >>>>>> <param name="flash.runtime" value="swf11" /> >>>>>> <param name="flash.main.file" value="main.as3.lzx" /> >>>>>> <param name="flash.out.file" value="main.as3.swf11.swf" /> >>>>>> <param name="flash.debug" value="" /> >>>>>> </antcall> >>>>>> </target> >>>>>> >>>>>> <target name="compile.laszlo.main.debug.as3" >>>>>> depends="-retrieve-openlaszlo46"> >>>>>> >>>>>> <antcall target="-compile.flash" inheritAll="true" >>>>>> inheritRefs="true"> >>>>>> <param name="flash.classpath.ref" value="laszlo46.lib" /> >>>>>> <param name="flash.src.dir" value="${laszlo.as3.src.dir}" >>>>>> /> >>>>>> >>>>>> <param name="flash.lps.home" value="${laszlo46.home}" /> >>>>>> <param name="flash.runtime" value="swf11" /> >>>>>> <param name="flash.main.file" value="main.as3.lzx" /> >>>>>> <param name="flash.out.file" >>>>>> value="maindebug.as3.swf11.swf" /> >>>>>> >>>>>> <param name="flash.debug" value="--debug" /> >>>>>> </antcall> >>>>>> </target> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I think the XML is correct, the paths point to valid files but I >>>>>> wonder why the SWF11 compilation has this issue. I never saw this happen >>>>>> in >>>>>> SWF10 and the 4.5 SDK. >>>>>> >>>>>> After doing a manual: chmod +x >>>>>> /Users/swagner/Documents/workspaces/openmeetings_zz/Openmeetings/build/openlaszlo46/WEB-INF/flexsdk/4.6.0/bin/mxmlc >>>>>> >>>>>> Everything seems to be fine. >>>>>> >>>>>> Sebastian >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> 2013/2/16 [email protected] <[email protected]> >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks! I will test later today. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Sebastian >>>>>>> Am 16.02.2013 00:18 schrieb "Maxim Solodovnik" <[email protected] >>>>>>> >: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 1) and 2) are done >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> here is the example of ant target modified to use 4.9.5 compiler >>>>>>>> and resulting "BUILD SUCCESSFUL" (32-bit JDK only) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> <target name="compile.laszlo.networktesting.debug" depends="* >>>>>>>> -retrieve-openlaszlo46*"> >>>>>>>> <antcall target="-compile.flash" inheritAll="true" >>>>>>>> inheritRefs="true"> >>>>>>>> <param name="flash.classpath.ref" value="*laszlo46.lib*" /> >>>>>>>> <param name="flash.src.dir" >>>>>>>> value="${laszlo.as3.src.dir}/networkTesting" /> >>>>>>>> <param name="flash.lps.home" value="${*laszlo46.home*}" /> >>>>>>>> <param name="flash.runtime" value="*swf11*" /> >>>>>>>> <param name="flash.main.file" value="networktesting.lzx" /> >>>>>>>> <param name="flash.out.file" value="*networktestingdebug.swf11.swf*" >>>>>>>> /> >>>>>>>> <param name="flash.debug" value="--debug" /> >>>>>>>> </antcall> >>>>>>>> </target> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> highlighted are parts necessary to use Flex 4.6 >>>>>>>> In effect since rev. 1446514 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 5:56 PM, Maxim Solodovnik < >>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> According to this: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> http://www.openlaszlo.org/pipermail/laszlo-dev/2012-July/024933.html >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> we going to be limited on 32bit JDK :( >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 5:41 PM, Maxim Solodovnik < >>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Flex 4.6 is not included into openlaszlo 5.0. Will use 4.9.5. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 1:47 PM, Maxim Solodovnik < >>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> ok >>>>>>>>>>> I'll check and send you results of this investigation >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 1:45 PM, [email protected] < >>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I think we need Flex 4.6. >>>>>>>>>>>> It could be that still this is our branch to use: >>>>>>>>>>>> http://svn.openlaszlo.org/openlaszlo/branches/flex4.6/ >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> And as far as I know this branch is a 1:1 copy of the 4.9.5 >>>>>>>>>>>> release. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> But lets check OpenLaszlo trunk, maybe somebody has made the >>>>>>>>>>>> changes needed to have swf11 and flex 4.6 available. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Sebastian >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> 2013/2/15 [email protected] <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Plz check what SDK is used internally / what Flex (what version >>>>>>>>>>>>> of mxmlc.jar) compiler is used? >>>>>>>>>>>>> It might happen that this does not even compile to SWF11. >>>>>>>>>>>>> My Internet is currently pretty slow, sorry it would take a >>>>>>>>>>>>> while to check that here. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks! >>>>>>>>>>>>> Sebastian >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 2013/2/15 Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.openlaszlo.org/download >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> OpenLaszlo Latest Nightly Builds >>>>>>>>>>>>>> points to 5.0b2 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'll use it >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 1:12 PM, [email protected] < >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah sure Raju has set up a new repository. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If there is a nightly build from that we should use it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you please post the link to it? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I guess you need a nightly build, building OpenLaszlo from >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> source is not so straightforward ... you need a lot of special >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tools. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> actually without OSX its almost impossible (except you are a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cygwin geek) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sebastian >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2013/2/15 Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I googled openlaszlo swf 11 and get the post regarding >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> latest openlaszlo from git >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it is 5.0 currently >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 12:59 PM, [email protected] < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Good question. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Basically we have that 4.9.5 version from Raju which is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> using the needed flex SDK internally. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't know if those changes ever made it into the 5.0 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Version, espacially which flex SDK 5.0 is using internally. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If 5.0 uses a newer SDK and supports swf11 we should use >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Seb >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 15.02.2013 18:28 schrieb "Maxim Solodovnik" < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]>: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Should openlaszlo 4.9.5 or 5.0 should be used? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 10:50 AM, Maxim Solodovnik < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OK I'll handle 1 and 2 today (or tonight :) ) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 10:48 AM, [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From my perspective we need to do the following: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1) add openlaszlo 4.9.5 to our ivy list to have both >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> runtime environments: 4.9 and 4.9.5 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Question: How will ivy behave when you want / force >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> both versions? Cause I can imagine Ivy will think that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4.9.5 is sufficient >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to download. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But we need also version 4.9 because 4.9.5 does not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SWF8 file format anymore. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any ideas on that? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My roughest idea would be to rename the entire .tgz >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> file so that it will treat it as if those or completely >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> different packages. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2) And then we need to refactor the build.xml to have >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> two openlaszlo directories (laszlo.home) options. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So when compiling the SWF8 stuff it will use >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> openlaszlo4.9 and when it compiles to SWF11 it will use >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> openlaszlo 4.9.5 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3) We need to refactor the Audio/Video components. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Basically >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in editRecordStreamSWF10.lzx line 240 "getMicrophone" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has to be replaced with: "getEnhancedMicrophone" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://help.adobe.com/en_US/FlashPlatform/reference/actionscript/3/flash/media/Microphone.html >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And there has to be checked which of those config >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> values are valid (or which ones are important to be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> added). Cause enhanced >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> microphones have a different option set. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Some of those new variables should be made available >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> through the config.xml (and old ones removed). >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @Maxim: If you could take care about 1) + 2) I would be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> really thankful. Issue 3) is basically something I have >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> been testing >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> already. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sebastian >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sebastian Wagner >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.webbase-design.de >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.wagner-sebastian.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WBR >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WBR >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WBR >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sebastian Wagner >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.webbase-design.de >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.wagner-sebastian.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> WBR >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>> Sebastian Wagner >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock >>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.webbase-design.de >>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.wagner-sebastian.com >>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>> Sebastian Wagner >>>>>>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock >>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.webbase-design.de >>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.wagner-sebastian.com >>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>> WBR >>>>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> WBR >>>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> WBR >>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> WBR >>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Sebastian Wagner >>>>>> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock >>>>>> http://www.webbase-design.de >>>>>> http://www.wagner-sebastian.com >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Sebastian Wagner >>>>> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock >>>>> http://www.webbase-design.de >>>>> http://www.wagner-sebastian.com >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> WBR >>>> Maxim aka solomax >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Sebastian Wagner >>> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock >>> http://www.webbase-design.de >>> http://www.wagner-sebastian.com >>> [email protected] >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> WBR >> Maxim aka solomax >> > > > > -- > Sebastian Wagner > https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock > http://www.webbase-design.de > http://www.wagner-sebastian.com > [email protected] > -- WBR Maxim aka solomax
