already switched all projects to this group

On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 2:02 PM, Alexei Fedotov <alexei.fedo...@gmail.com>wrote:

> Denis can create any nice looking groups @dataved.ru, e.g.
> red5...@dataved.ru. This is free and robust because this is Google
> Apps account.
>
> --
> With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями,
> Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов,
> http://dataved.ru/
> +7 916 562 8095
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 10:31 AM, seba.wag...@gmail.com
> <seba.wag...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!forum/apache-openmeetings-extras
> >
> > Group mail address would be:
> > apache-openmeetings-ext...@googlegroups.com<
> openmeetings-apache-ext...@googlegroups.com>
> > ... yeah but you got it already  :)
> >
> > Sebastian
> >
> >
> > 2013/3/22 Maxim Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com>
> >
> >> great :)
> >> can you create one?
> >> And we will use it's email in all "extra projects"
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 1:17 PM, seba.wag...@gmail.com <
> >> seba.wag...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> > just create a Google Group for example?
> >> > Anybody interested in those emails can subscribe to it.
> >> >
> >> > Sebastian
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > 2013/3/22 Maxim Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com>
> >> >
> >> > > Maybe anybody knows how to create group email alias for free?
> >> > > something like: dev-om-apache-ext...@whatever.com?
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 10:36 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> >> solomax...@gmail.com
> >> > > >wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > > I have updated all apache-extras projects (replace dev@ with my
> >> email
> >> > or
> >> > > > Sebastian's email)
> >> > > > except for  (no adminitration rights)
> >> > > >
> >> >
> https://code.google.com/a/apache-extras.org/p/openmeetings-atutor-plugin
> >> > > > https://code.google.com/p/red5phone/
> >> > > >
> >> > > > @Sebastian can you update these two?
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 4:13 AM, seba.wag...@gmail.com <
> >> > > > seba.wag...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > > >
> >> > > >> The OpenMeetings PMC agrees on  disabling those notifications.
> >> > > >> Anybody interested in those emails can subscribe to it on its
> own.
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> Sebastian
> >> > > >> Am 22.03.2013 05:34 schrieb "Luciano Resende" <
> luckbr1...@gmail.com
> >> >:
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> > On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 3:00 AM, seba.wag...@gmail.com
> >> > > >> > <seba.wag...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > > >> > > There is a flag in the mail notification to turn of diff's in
> >> > those
> >> > > >> > emails.
> >> > > >> > > So theoretically those emails don't have to include not even
> >> code
> >> > > >> > fragments
> >> > > >> > > of GPL licensed code.
> >> > > >> > > So those emails could become what they initially should have
> >> been:
> >> > > >> Some
> >> > > >> > > simple notification of activity.
> >> > > >> > >
> >> > > >> > > We are actually also not interested in what exactly has
> changed
> >> or
> >> > > >> > archiving
> >> > > >> > > external activities.
> >> > > >> > > If anybody is interested in those projects he can catch up
> with
> >> > > those
> >> > > >> > > involved there.
> >> > > >> > >
> >> > > >> > > All we are interested is a "heads up" there is something
> going
> >> on
> >> > as
> >> > > >> we
> >> > > >> > > provide integration APIs that 3th parties are using.
> >> > > >> > >
> >> > > >> > > There are also a number of more 3th party projects that send
> >> those
> >> > > >> pings.
> >> > > >> > > Basically all projects hosted at apache-extras.org are
> >> configured
> >> > > to
> >> > > >> > send a
> >> > > >> > > ping to our list when there was a SVN commit.
> >> > > >> > >
> >> > > >>
> >> > >
> >>
> http://code.google.com/a/apache-extras.org/hosting/search?q=openmeetings
> >> > > >> > >
> >> > > >> > > It is argueable if an Apache developer list is the right
> place
> >> to
> >> > > have
> >> > > >> > such
> >> > > >> > > a "news aggregator" for activities around OpenMeetings.
> >> > > >> > > There might be easy ways to resolve such a conflict. Possibly
> >> for
> >> > > >> > example a
> >> > > >> > > Google Group Mailing list. "openmeetings-apache-extras" or
> >> > something
> >> > > >> like
> >> > > >> > > that. It does in fact not make a difference, just another
> >> mailing
> >> > > >> list to
> >> > > >> > > monitor :)
> >> > > >> > > It is just a bit an imaginary line that we draw here from my
> >> point
> >> > > of
> >> > > >> > view.
> >> > > >> > >
> >> > > >> > > Sebastian
> >> > > >> > >
> >> > > >> > >
> >> > > >> > > 2013/3/21 Jim Jagielski <j...@apache.org>
> >> > > >> > >>
> >> > > >> > >> IMO, it's inappropriate content for a dev@ list, which is
> >> > > >> > >> a place to *discuss* development, not an "archive" for
> >> > > >> > >> external development, legal issues notwithstanding.
> >> > > >> > >>
> >> > > >> > >> On Mar 20, 2013, at 7:16 AM, Shane Curcuru <
> >> a...@shanecurcuru.org
> >> > >
> >> > > >> > wrote:
> >> > > >> > >>
> >> > > >> > >> > I would be uncomfortable as well. If project members want
> to
> >> > > follow
> >> > > >> > >> > external projects that's great, but duplicating all of an
> >> > > external
> >> > > >> > project's
> >> > > >> > >> > messages onto the public dev@ list is... not a best
> >> practice,
> >> > to
> >> > > >> say
> >> > > >> > the
> >> > > >> > >> > least.
> >> > > >> > >> >
> >> > > >> > >> > Personally, I'd have to presume (for the average user)
> that
> >> > > >> everything
> >> > > >> > >> > coming from that other GPL licensed project is GPL.  Thus,
> >> this
> >> > > >> seems
> >> > > >> > to
> >> > > >> > >> > violate the principle of least surprise and the fact that
> GPL
> >> > is
> >> > > >> > Category X,
> >> > > >> > >> > which means that end users should be able to use Apache
> >> > projects
> >> > > >> and
> >> > > >> > >> > products without having to worry that GPL code is
> included -
> >> > > either
> >> > > >> > in the
> >> > > >> > >> > download, or in other places on our websites or mailing
> >> lists.
> >> > > >> > >> >
> >> > > >> > >> > - Shane
> >> > > >> > >> >
> >> > > >> > >> > On 3/19/2013 6:51 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> >> > > >> > >> >> It's come to my attention that the openmeetings project
> has
> >> > > >> recently
> >> > > >> > >> >> subscribed their dev list to the commit messages of a
> Google
> >> > > Code
> >> > > >> > >> >> hosted
> >> > > >> > >> >> project under the GPL. I asked why and was told " those
> >> > updates
> >> > > >> are
> >> > > >> > >> >> interesting for our integration API." There is some
> overlap
> >> in
> >> > > >> > >> >> committers but the project communities do seem to be
> >> distinct
> >> > > >> other
> >> > > >> > >> >> than
> >> > > >> > >> >> this cross-posting of commits.
> >> > > >> > >> >>
> >> > > >> > >> >> I'm quite uncomfortable about this as it means that GPL
> code
> >> > is
> >> > > >> > passing
> >> > > >> > >> >> through our lists (and being archived) without any clear
> >> > > >> indication
> >> > > >> > of
> >> > > >> > >> >> its legal status. What I'm not sure about is whether my
> >> > > >> discomfort is
> >> > > >> > >> >> because of an irrational fear of someone inadvertently
> using
> >> > GPL
> >> > > >> code
> >> > > >> > >> >> without knowing it or whether that is, in fact, a
> rational
> >> > fear.
> >> > > >> > >> >>
> >> > > >> > >> >> Advice please?
> >> > > >> > >> >>
> >> > > >> > >> >> Ross
> >> > > >> > >> >>
> >> > > >> > >> >>
> >> > > >> > >> >> --
> >> > > >> > >> >> Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
> >> > > >> > >> >> Programme Leader (Open Development)
> >> > > >> > >> >> OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
> >> > > >> > >> >>
> >> > > >> > >> >
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> > We have had a similar discussion in the ComDev related to
> Apache
> >> > > >> > Extras [1], and the consensus at that time was that external
> >> > projects,
> >> > > >> > particular the ones that are not compatible with AL2, should be
> >> > > >> > managed separately, which means that we should not encourage
> PMCs
> >> to
> >> > > >> > have their official mailing lists receiving e-mails from other
> >> > > >> > non-Apache GPL projects. If individuals are interested on
> what's
> >> > going
> >> > > >> > on with external projects, they should subscribe to these
> projects
> >> > > >> > mailing list as an individual.
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >>
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/community-dev/201209.mbox/%3CCALvzYd-h4Q%3DcTEgGqCNEEninhVose8uiGt2gTK22n9cMr_kVyg%40mail.gmail.com%3E
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> > --
> >> > > >> > Luciano Resende
> >> > > >> > http://people.apache.org/~lresende
> >> > > >> > http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> >> > > >> > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> >
> >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > > >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscr...@apache.org
> >> > > >> > For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-h...@apache.org
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > --
> >> > > > WBR
> >> > > > Maxim aka solomax
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > --
> >> > > WBR
> >> > > Maxim aka solomax
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Sebastian Wagner
> >> > https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
> >> > http://www.webbase-design.de
> >> > http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
> >> > seba.wag...@gmail.com
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> WBR
> >> Maxim aka solomax
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sebastian Wagner
> > https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
> > http://www.webbase-design.de
> > http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
> > seba.wag...@gmail.com
>



-- 
WBR
Maxim aka solomax

Reply via email to