https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!forum/apache-openmeetings-extras
Group mail address would be: [email protected]<[email protected]> ... yeah but you got it already :) Sebastian 2013/3/22 Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]> > great :) > can you create one? > And we will use it's email in all "extra projects" > > > On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 1:17 PM, [email protected] < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > just create a Google Group for example? > > Anybody interested in those emails can subscribe to it. > > > > Sebastian > > > > > > 2013/3/22 Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]> > > > > > Maybe anybody knows how to create group email alias for free? > > > something like: [email protected]? > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 10:36 AM, Maxim Solodovnik < > [email protected] > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > I have updated all apache-extras projects (replace dev@ with my > email > > or > > > > Sebastian's email) > > > > except for (no adminitration rights) > > > > > > https://code.google.com/a/apache-extras.org/p/openmeetings-atutor-plugin > > > > https://code.google.com/p/red5phone/ > > > > > > > > @Sebastian can you update these two? > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 4:13 AM, [email protected] < > > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > >> The OpenMeetings PMC agrees on disabling those notifications. > > > >> Anybody interested in those emails can subscribe to it on its own. > > > >> > > > >> Sebastian > > > >> Am 22.03.2013 05:34 schrieb "Luciano Resende" <[email protected] > >: > > > >> > > > >> > On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 3:00 AM, [email protected] > > > >> > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> > > There is a flag in the mail notification to turn of diff's in > > those > > > >> > emails. > > > >> > > So theoretically those emails don't have to include not even > code > > > >> > fragments > > > >> > > of GPL licensed code. > > > >> > > So those emails could become what they initially should have > been: > > > >> Some > > > >> > > simple notification of activity. > > > >> > > > > > >> > > We are actually also not interested in what exactly has changed > or > > > >> > archiving > > > >> > > external activities. > > > >> > > If anybody is interested in those projects he can catch up with > > > those > > > >> > > involved there. > > > >> > > > > > >> > > All we are interested is a "heads up" there is something going > on > > as > > > >> we > > > >> > > provide integration APIs that 3th parties are using. > > > >> > > > > > >> > > There are also a number of more 3th party projects that send > those > > > >> pings. > > > >> > > Basically all projects hosted at apache-extras.org are > configured > > > to > > > >> > send a > > > >> > > ping to our list when there was a SVN commit. > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > http://code.google.com/a/apache-extras.org/hosting/search?q=openmeetings > > > >> > > > > > >> > > It is argueable if an Apache developer list is the right place > to > > > have > > > >> > such > > > >> > > a "news aggregator" for activities around OpenMeetings. > > > >> > > There might be easy ways to resolve such a conflict. Possibly > for > > > >> > example a > > > >> > > Google Group Mailing list. "openmeetings-apache-extras" or > > something > > > >> like > > > >> > > that. It does in fact not make a difference, just another > mailing > > > >> list to > > > >> > > monitor :) > > > >> > > It is just a bit an imaginary line that we draw here from my > point > > > of > > > >> > view. > > > >> > > > > > >> > > Sebastian > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > 2013/3/21 Jim Jagielski <[email protected]> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> IMO, it's inappropriate content for a dev@ list, which is > > > >> > >> a place to *discuss* development, not an "archive" for > > > >> > >> external development, legal issues notwithstanding. > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> On Mar 20, 2013, at 7:16 AM, Shane Curcuru < > [email protected] > > > > > > >> > wrote: > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > I would be uncomfortable as well. If project members want to > > > follow > > > >> > >> > external projects that's great, but duplicating all of an > > > external > > > >> > project's > > > >> > >> > messages onto the public dev@ list is... not a best > practice, > > to > > > >> say > > > >> > the > > > >> > >> > least. > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > Personally, I'd have to presume (for the average user) that > > > >> everything > > > >> > >> > coming from that other GPL licensed project is GPL. Thus, > this > > > >> seems > > > >> > to > > > >> > >> > violate the principle of least surprise and the fact that GPL > > is > > > >> > Category X, > > > >> > >> > which means that end users should be able to use Apache > > projects > > > >> and > > > >> > >> > products without having to worry that GPL code is included - > > > either > > > >> > in the > > > >> > >> > download, or in other places on our websites or mailing > lists. > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > - Shane > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > On 3/19/2013 6:51 PM, Ross Gardler wrote: > > > >> > >> >> It's come to my attention that the openmeetings project has > > > >> recently > > > >> > >> >> subscribed their dev list to the commit messages of a Google > > > Code > > > >> > >> >> hosted > > > >> > >> >> project under the GPL. I asked why and was told " those > > updates > > > >> are > > > >> > >> >> interesting for our integration API." There is some overlap > in > > > >> > >> >> committers but the project communities do seem to be > distinct > > > >> other > > > >> > >> >> than > > > >> > >> >> this cross-posting of commits. > > > >> > >> >> > > > >> > >> >> I'm quite uncomfortable about this as it means that GPL code > > is > > > >> > passing > > > >> > >> >> through our lists (and being archived) without any clear > > > >> indication > > > >> > of > > > >> > >> >> its legal status. What I'm not sure about is whether my > > > >> discomfort is > > > >> > >> >> because of an irrational fear of someone inadvertently using > > GPL > > > >> code > > > >> > >> >> without knowing it or whether that is, in fact, a rational > > fear. > > > >> > >> >> > > > >> > >> >> Advice please? > > > >> > >> >> > > > >> > >> >> Ross > > > >> > >> >> > > > >> > >> >> > > > >> > >> >> -- > > > >> > >> >> Ross Gardler (@rgardler) > > > >> > >> >> Programme Leader (Open Development) > > > >> > >> >> OpenDirective http://opendirective.com > > > >> > >> >> > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > We have had a similar discussion in the ComDev related to Apache > > > >> > Extras [1], and the consensus at that time was that external > > projects, > > > >> > particular the ones that are not compatible with AL2, should be > > > >> > managed separately, which means that we should not encourage PMCs > to > > > >> > have their official mailing lists receiving e-mails from other > > > >> > non-Apache GPL projects. If individuals are interested on what's > > going > > > >> > on with external projects, they should subscribe to these projects > > > >> > mailing list as an individual. > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/community-dev/201209.mbox/%3CCALvzYd-h4Q%3DcTEgGqCNEEninhVose8uiGt2gTK22n9cMr_kVyg%40mail.gmail.com%3E > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > -- > > > >> > Luciano Resende > > > >> > http://people.apache.org/~lresende > > > >> > http://twitter.com/lresende1975 > > > >> > http://lresende.blogspot.com/ > > > >> > > > > >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > > >> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > WBR > > > > Maxim aka solomax > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > WBR > > > Maxim aka solomax > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Sebastian Wagner > > https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock > > http://www.webbase-design.de > > http://www.wagner-sebastian.com > > [email protected] > > > > > > -- > WBR > Maxim aka solomax > -- Sebastian Wagner https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock http://www.webbase-design.de http://www.wagner-sebastian.com [email protected]
