>> I would say: in 2.1 some attributes will be ONLY in config.xml
I'll correct myself in both versions network related parameters can be
passed via injecting it into HTML

I can implement it


On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 6:54 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]>wrote:

> I would say: in 2.1 some attributes will be ONLY in config.xml
> I believe all attributes can be moved into DB in 3.0
> Actually network attributes can be passed as  parameters to the flash tag
> in browser (object tag if I'm not mistaken)
> Since all static functionality except for video (for now) will be
> available via HTML all these parameter will be accessible to the end user
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 6:48 PM, Artyom Horuzhenko <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> Will some attributes be kept in the config file and in the database? What
>> reason of that moving?
>>
>>
>> 2013/4/24 Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]>
>>
>> > network related staff can be moved to DB only if config will be
>> available
>> > via REST (probably in 3.0 we can bypass this)
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 6:33 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]
>> > >wrote:
>> >
>> > > I'll vote for moving everything into DB
>> > > Appdisplay can be removed (in 3.0 in favor of CSS)
>> > > AvailableCamResolutions can be new tables like room types
>> > >
>> > > Client reload will still be necessary to renew the values (in 2.1.X)
>> > >
>> > > currentappname
>> > > currentappnameurl
>> > > can be dropped IMHO
>> > > other should be reviewed
>> > >
>> > > Who is going to implement this?
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 5:45 PM, Artyom Horuzhenko <
>> [email protected]
>> > >wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> We also have some parameters which can't be moved to database in
>> current
>> > >> implementation, for example "appdisplay",
>> "availableCameraResolutions".
>> > In
>> > >> my opinion all other parameters could be moved to database as needed.
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> 2013/4/24 Alexei Fedotov <[email protected]>
>> > >>
>> > >> > I mostly agree.
>> > >> >
>> > >> > Maybe we should have several parameter groups - eg system
>> parameters,
>> > >> those
>> > >> > to change with care
>> > >> > On Apr 24, 2013 2:32 PM, "[email protected]" <
>> > [email protected]
>> > >> >
>> > >> > wrote:
>> > >> >
>> > >> > > If that param is part of the Administration > Configuration I
>> would
>> > >> > propose
>> > >> > > to have a general review which of those parameters of the
>> > config.xml.
>> > >> > > Maybe even more of them should be moved to the database then.
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > This is our current client side config file:
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > >
>> > >> >
>> > >>
>> >
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openmeetings/trunk/singlewebapp/WebContent/openmeetings/config.xml?view=co&content-type=text%2Fplain
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > Candidates the can be moved to the database are ... all ?
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > I don't see a lot of sense if trying to follow two different
>> > >> approaches
>> > >> > and
>> > >> > > having multiple places for config's.
>> > >> > > It will just lead to feedback that was given in the past like
>> > >> > "OpenMeetings
>> > >> > > configuration is spread around a dozen of files"
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > Seems like a majority of people would prefer a database solution.
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > So one potential fix or idea would be for example to create the
>> > >> > config.xml
>> > >> > > via a Servlet dynamically.
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > That way the client can have still a very easy way of loading the
>> > >> config
>> > >> > > file by simply parsing it.
>> > >> > > And you can generate the config.xml dynamically on server side
>> based
>> > >> on
>> > >> > > database values.
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > From that point of view _any_ value of the config.xml could
>> > >> immediately
>> > >> > > move to the database.
>> > >> > > We just have to keep in mind that this config.xml can be
>> retrieved
>> > >> > > anonymously, so it makes no sense to put any security sensible
>> data
>> > >> into
>> > >> > > it.
>> > >> > > But it would for example simplify some of our current docs as
>> there
>> > >> is no
>> > >> > > separated configuration for client and server needed, like
>> > potentially
>> > >> > the
>> > >> > > port configuration.
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > Would do folks think about that idea?
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > Sebastian
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > 2013/4/24 Alexei Fedotov <[email protected]>
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > > @Sebastian
>> > >> > > > As for hardware, we used jabra.
>> > >> > > > On Apr 24, 2013 12:54 PM, "Vasya" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > > > +1 for database
>> > >> > > > >
>> > >> > > > > Thanks,
>> > >> > > > > Vasiliy
>> > >> > > > >
>> > >> > > > >
>> > >> > > > > On 24.04.2013 14:49, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
>> > >> > > > >
>> > >> > > > >> I would prefer Admin->configuration since it is migrated
>> while
>> > OM
>> > >> > > > upgrades
>> > >> > > > >> But config.xml requires less code changes :)
>> > >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > > >> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 2:40 PM, [email protected] <
>> > >> > > > >> [email protected]> wrote:
>> > >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > > >>  The basic rule so far was to put client side/ UI / layout
>> > >> settings
>> > >> > in
>> > >> > > > the
>> > >> > > > >>> config.xml.
>> > >> > > > >>> The config.xml is parsed by both SWFs (SWF8 and SWF10) on
>> > >> startup
>> > >> > one
>> > >> > > > >>> time.
>> > >> > > > >>> So it is also rather easy compared to have a database value
>> > that
>> > >> > then
>> > >> > > > has
>> > >> > > > >>> to be somehow loaded to the client.
>> > >> > > > >>>
>> > >> > > > >>> Sebastian
>> > >> > > > >>>
>> > >> > > > >>>
>> > >> > > > >>> 2013/4/24 Artyom Horuzhenko <[email protected]>
>> > >> > > > >>>
>> > >> > > > >>>  What kind of solution would be better for switching
>> codecs,
>> > >> AEC,
>> > >> > EM
>> > >> > > > and
>> > >> > > > >>>> echo suppression: using config.xml or "Configuration" in
>> the
>> > >> > > > >>>> "Administration" menu?
>> > >> > > > >>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>> 2013/4/23 Joseph Karwat <[email protected]>
>> > >> > > > >>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>  IMHO. When something does not work well users generally
>> ask
>> > >> for
>> > >> > > help
>> > >> > > > >>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>> from
>> > >> > > > >>>
>> > >> > > > >>>> their service provider.  In our shop our staff explains
>> AEC
>> > >> issues
>> > >> > > to
>> > >> > > > >>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>> end
>> > >> > > > >>>
>> > >> > > > >>>> users and works with them to resolve the issue.  Having
>> AEC
>> > as
>> > >> an
>> > >> > > easy
>> > >> > > > >>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>> to
>> > >> > > > >>>
>> > >> > > > >>>> enable/disable user option, is very helpful in providing
>> the
>> > >> type
>> > >> > of
>> > >> > > > >>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>> end
>> > >> > > > >>>
>> > >> > > > >>>> user support that will enable widespread adoption of OM.
>> > >> > > > >>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>> I'd be pleased to work with the group to formally test
>> AEC
>> > and
>> > >> > > > resolve
>> > >> > > > >>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>> this
>> > >> > > > >>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>> issue.
>> > >> > > > >>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>> Joseph Karwat | 415-462-0263 | JellVideo |
>> www.jellnet.com|
>> > >> > > > >>>>> JELL NETWORKS, INC.
>> > >> > > > >>>>> Enterprise Video Collaboration Solutions
>> > >> > > > >>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>> Click Here to Register for your JellVideo Collaboration
>> > >> Account
>> > >> > > > >>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>> -----Original Message-----
>> > >> > > > >>>>> From: [email protected] [mailto:
>> [email protected]]
>> > >> > > > >>>>> Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2013 1:53 AM
>> > >> > > > >>>>> To: dev
>> > >> > > > >>>>> Subject: Re: AEC in the new release
>> > >> > > > >>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>> IMHO having yet another checkbox where the user can
>> decide
>> > to
>> > >> > > enable
>> > >> > > > or
>> > >> > > > >>>>> disable AEC can be only an additional thing on top of a
>> > >> general
>> > >> > > > system
>> > >> > > > >>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>> wide
>> > >> > > > >>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>> configuration.
>> > >> > > > >>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>> The problem with this is for example that the average
>> user
>> > >> does
>> > >> > not
>> > >> > > > >>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>> even
>> > >> > > > >>>
>> > >> > > > >>>> know what AEC means.
>> > >> > > > >>>>> Or what is the difference between hardware echo
>> cancellation
>> > >> and
>> > >> > > > >>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>> software
>> > >> > > > >>>
>> > >> > > > >>>> echo cancellation ?!
>> > >> > > > >>>>> So what would be the benefit for him in having a checkbox
>> > >> tagged
>> > >> > > > >>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>> "enabled
>> > >> > > > >>>
>> > >> > > > >>>> AEC" ?
>> > >> > > > >>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>> One of the concerns people have against OpenMeetings is
>> its
>> > >> > > > complexity.
>> > >> > > > >>>>> They just want to conference and not bother around with a
>> > lot
>> > >> of
>> > >> > > > >>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>> options.
>> > >> > > > >>>
>> > >> > > > >>>> I would also not disable the AEC feature by default as
>> long
>> > as
>> > >> > there
>> > >> > > > is
>> > >> > > > >>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>> no
>> > >> > > > >>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>> concrete use-case where AEC (or enhancedMicro mode)
>> leads to
>> > >> an
>> > >> > > > issue.
>> > >> > > > >>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>> Same for h264. There was a discussion that included h264
>> a
>> > >> couple
>> > >> > > of
>> > >> > > > >>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>> weeks
>> > >> > > > >>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>> ago:
>> > >> > > > >>>>> http://markmail.org/message/**fctg6eo5qf5hhcaa<
>> > >> > > > http://markmail.org/message/fctg6eo5qf5hhcaa>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>> The consens was:
>> > >> > > > >>>>>   - The amount of CPU that our clients needed more was
>> not
>> > >> > > > measurable.
>> > >> > > > >>>>>   - There is no concrete use case where enabling or
>> > disabling
>> > >> > h264
>> > >> > > > >>>>> would
>> > >> > > > >>>>> improve anything I agree that having a config for the
>> Video
>> > >> > codec,
>> > >> > > > same
>> > >> > > > >>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>> as
>> > >> > > > >>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>> the Microphone Mode, would be nice.
>> > >> > > > >>>>> But changing any defaults now back and forth without
>> > concrete
>> > >> use
>> > >> > > > cases
>> > >> > > > >>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>> and
>> > >> > > > >>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>> some kind of test plan does not make a lot of sense to
>> me.
>> > >> > > > >>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>> So what I would propose is:
>> > >> > > > >>>>>   - Make Microphone and VideoCodec configurable and
>> > >> documentate
>> > >> > > this
>> > >> > > > >>>>>   - Set up a concrete test plan and communicate that
>> through
>> > >> our
>> > >> > > > >>>>> mailing
>> > >> > > > >>>>> lists.
>> > >> > > > >>>>> Based on the feedback we might then discuss changing some
>> > >> > defaults.
>> > >> > > > >>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>> Sebastian
>> > >> > > > >>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>> 2013/4/23 Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>  My previous comment was regarding video codec Auto
>> > selecting
>> > >> > h264
>> > >> > > > >>>>>> based on SIP setting is not a good idea IMHO
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>> On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Artyom Horuzhenko <
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>> [email protected]
>> > >> > > > >>>
>> > >> > > > >>>> wrote:
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>> Usually (for example, in Linphone) echo cancellation
>> > option
>> > >> is
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>> available for every user. In my opinion it would be
>> better
>> > >> to
>> > >> > > allow
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>> users to decide use echo cancellation or not because
>> its
>> > >> > > efficiency
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>> depends on hardware.
>> > >> > > > >>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>> 2013/4/23 Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>  Maybe it is better to make it configurable somehow?
>> > >> config.xml
>> > >> > > is
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>> good candidate IMHO
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 2:56 PM, Artyom Horuzhenko
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>> <[email protected]
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> Hello,
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> I suppose using h264 would be necessary only in SIP
>> > rooms,
>> > >> > for
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> all
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>> other
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>> rooms - codec which used before (h263?). It avoids any
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> suspections
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>> about
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>> h264 issues and increses performance. I'm also going
>> to
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> implement
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>> switching
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> microphone mode in the audio/video test dialog. Is
>> there
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>> anybody
>> > >> > > > >>>
>> > >> > > > >>>> who disagree with this idea?
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> 2013/4/23 Alexei Fedotov <[email protected]>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>  That would be great!
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>> On Apr 23, 2013 5:36 AM, "Maxim Solodovnik"
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>> @Alexei this definitely can be done in realtime, BUT
>> > ...
>> > >> :)
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> The setting affects Working microphone so it is
>> > >> impossible
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> to
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>> ON/OFF
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>> it
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> while speaking :(
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> The only option I can see is to add dropdown
>> control
>> > to
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>> testSetupDialog
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> (the one with choose camera and test recording). So
>> we
>> > can
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> have
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>> something
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>> like:
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> 1) default system setting (can be moved to
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Admin->configuration
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>> to
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>> avoid
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>> rewriting it after each upgrade)
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> 2) per user setting stored in LocalData (like
>> > >> rememberLogin
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>> default
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>> cam/mic
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> etc.)
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> using above scheme user can change the setting
>> while
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> entering the
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>> room
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> or
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>> "re-sync" audio/video
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> What do you think?
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 3:24 AM, Joseph Karwat <
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>> [email protected]>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>> wrote:
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>  We tested AEC out-of-the-box. We just installed
>> and
>> > >> ran a
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> meeting
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>> in
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> OM2.1- Litle or no echo.  We then, using the exact
>> same
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> configuration,
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>> logged in to an OM2.0 server and ran a meeting. We
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> experienced
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> substantial
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> echo. We were both running a PC with Flash echo
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> cancellation on
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> but
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>> no
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>> hardware echo cancelation.
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Also for OM2.1 Where do I set the buffer lenghth?
>> >  Are
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> there
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> any
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>> other
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>> parameters/options I  should know about?
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Joseph Karwat | CEO | 415-462-0263 | JellVideo |
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> www.jellnet.com|
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>> JELL NETWORKS, INC.
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Enterprise Video Collaboration Solutions
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Click Here to Register for your JellVideo
>> > Collaboration
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Account
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> From: Alexei Fedotov [mailto:alexei.fedotov@gmail
>> .
>> > >> **com<
>> > >> > > > [email protected]>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> ]
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Monday, April 22, 2013 12:49 PM
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> To: [email protected]
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: RE: AEC in the new release
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Joseph, which devices show improvement? Which
>> buffer
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> length did
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> you
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>> use?
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> I like the suggestion - Maxim, how is it possible
>> to
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> configure
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> AEC
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>> in
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> realtime?
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 22, 2013 11:30 PM, "Joseph Karwat"
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>> We have a test OM2.1 server installed at AWS running
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Unbuntu
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> 12.04.
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> We tested AEC this morning for the first time and it
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> did
>> > >> > > > >>>
>> > >> > > > >>>> seem
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> to
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>> make
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>> the audio work very well.  Little if no echo.  We
>> still
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> need
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> to
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>> test
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>> under a wide range of scenarios, but we are
>> encouraged
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> by the performance this morning.
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> If you do make it a configurable setting. It
>> should
>> > be
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> an
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> option
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>> when
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>> setting up the room or allow the individual user to
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> enable/disabe
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>> AEC
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>> when in a conference room.
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Making it a system-wide configuration option will
>> > >> delay
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> testing
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>> and
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> adoption.
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> We will be conducting further testing of AEC over
>> > the
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> next
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> few
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>> days
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> and will report back with our findings.  Anyone
>> wishing
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> participate
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> in our AEC testing is encouraged to contact me.
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Joseph Karwat |415-462-0263 | JellVideo |
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> www.jellnet.com |
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> JELL
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>> NETWORKS, INC.
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Enterprise Video Collaboration Solutions
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Click Here to Register for your JellVideo
>> > >> Collaboration
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Account
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Alexei Fedotov [mailto:
>> alexei.fedotov@gmail.
>> > >> **com<
>> > >> > > > [email protected]>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> ]
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Monday, April 22, 2013 12:49 AM
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> To: dev; [email protected]
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: AEC in the new release
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> There are no answers. My point here is that we
>> can
>> > be
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> 100%
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> sure
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>> that
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>> today AEC does not work as expected, and provides
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> distinctive
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> and
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>> high
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> quality echo in 100% of situations when users use
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> separate
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> dynamic
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> and
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> microphone systems.
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> The new thing is AEC mechanism sometimes meddles
>> > with
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> hardware
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>> echo
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> cancellation support providing temporary sound
>> outages.
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> It
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> also
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>> provides visible de-synchronization between sound and
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> video
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> channels.
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>> If someone has a different experience, please, speak
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> up.
>> > >> > > > >>>
>> > >> > > > >>>> So I have two ideas to speak of. 1. Disable AEC in
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> openmeetings
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>> releases by default. It takes a simple configuration
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> change
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> to
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>> enable
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>> it. 2. Later understand when AEC really works, and
>> fix
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> it.
>> > >> > > > >>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>> Folks, please again let me know if you disagree and
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> have
>> > >> > > > >>>
>> > >> > > > >>>> beneficial
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> AEC experience.
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями,
>> Alexei
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Fedotov
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> /
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>> Алексей
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Федотов, http://dataved.ru/
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> +7 916 562 8095
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 11:11 PM, Alexei Fedotov
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello guys,
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> How AEC (acoustic echo cancellation) works for
>> you
>> > in
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> new
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>> release?
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Can anyone share usage experience?
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями,
>> > Alexei
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Fedotov
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>> /
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>> Алексей Федотов, http://dataved.ru/
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> +7 916 562 8095
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> --
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> WBR
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>> --
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>> WBR
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>> --
>> > >> > > > >>>>>> WBR
>> > >> > > > >>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>> --
>> > >> > > > >>>>> Sebastian Wagner
>> > >> > > > >>>>> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_**lock <
>> > >> > > https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
>> > >> > > > >
>> > >> > > > >>>>> http://www.webbase-design.de
>> > >> > > > >>>>> http://www.wagner-sebastian.**com <
>> > >> > http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > > >>>>> [email protected]
>> > >> > > > >>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>>>
>> > >> > > > >>>
>> > >> > > > >>> --
>> > >> > > > >>> Sebastian Wagner
>> > >> > > > >>> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_**lock <
>> > >> > https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > > >>> http://www.webbase-design.de
>> > >> > > > >>> http://www.wagner-sebastian.**com <
>> > >> http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > > >>> [email protected]
>> > >> > > > >>>
>> > >> > > > >>>
>> > >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > > >
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > --
>> > >> > > Sebastian Wagner
>> > >> > > https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
>> > >> > > http://www.webbase-design.de
>> > >> > > http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
>> > >> > > [email protected]
>> > >> > >
>> > >> >
>> > >>
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > WBR
>> > > Maxim aka solomax
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > WBR
>> > Maxim aka solomax
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax
>



-- 
WBR
Maxim aka solomax

Reply via email to