Video/audio SIP integration has never been a part of Openmeetings (as I know); Recordings didn't work before release, it's not new in 2.1.1; There are troubles with recent version of Adobe Flash in 2.1, it's not new too
2013/6/24 Alexei Fedotov <[email protected]> > Artyom, > I have updated the release notes with your input, and additional input > from Irina. > > --- > Video/audio SIP integration is no longer a part of Apache release. > Check free red5sip product for this integration. > > We also introduced reliability testing for this release (great job, > Vasily Degtyarev!). For 1 hour long conferences the following does not > work with Openmeetings 2.1.1: > * Recordigs > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-669 > * Recent version with Adobe Flash (please downgrade to 11.5 version) > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=885188 > * Multi-tabbing (no other flash application should be running in > different browsers or tabs) > --- > > > -- > With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями, > Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов, > http://dataved.ru/ > +7 916 562 8095 > > [1] Start using Apache Openmeetings today, http://openmeetings.apache.org/ > [2] Join Alexei Fedotov @linkedin, http://ru.linkedin.com/in/dataved/ > [3] Join Alexei Fedotov @facebook, http://www.facebook.com/openmeetings > > > On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 12:55 PM, Artyom Horuzhenko <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Alexei, we shouldn't worry about sip integeration in our releases until > > red5sip is not an Openmeetings part. For example, let's imagine if Linux > > developers say: "We can't release new kernel because OpenOffice has > various > > document rendering bugs". And Adobe Flash is not good example because > > Openmeetings uses flash, but red5sip uses Openmeetings to provide voip > > integration; all sip audio/video troubles are not cause of Openmeetings > > bugs. > > > > > > 2013/6/24 Alexei Fedotov <[email protected]> > > > >> I'm constantly getting enlightened by many people that red4sip is not > >> a part of Openmeetings. I'm well aware of that fact. :-) Adobe Flash > >> is not a part of Openmeetings as well, and cause us the problems > >> anyway. > >> > >> If you program does not run on Linux, release notes should say, "does > >> not run on Linux". IMHO, it's important to reference ecosystem > >> requirements in release notes. > >> > >> > >> -- > >> With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями, > >> Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов, > >> http://dataved.ru/ > >> +7 916 562 8095 > >> > >> [1] Start using Apache Openmeetings today, > http://openmeetings.apache.org/ > >> [2] Join Alexei Fedotov @linkedin, http://ru.linkedin.com/in/dataved/ > >> [3] Join Alexei Fedotov @facebook, http://www.facebook.com/openmeetings > >> > >> > >> On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 11:59 AM, Alexei Fedotov > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > The previous release was an important step for us, we graduated. Right > >> > now we should restore original "release" meaning by establishing the > >> > quality. There are two steps in establishing the quality. > >> > > >> > 1. Define the quality. Vasily did a good job here. > >> > 2. Improving the quality. Here we can improve more. > >> > > >> > I want release notes being correct and agreed with participants. > >> > Taking Artyom comment into account, I wrote the following attempt of > >> > release notes. > >> > > >> > The following no longer works with Openmeetings 2.1.1 (for 1 hour long > >> > conferences) > >> > * Recordigs > >> > * Recent version with Adobe Flash (please downgrade to 11.5 version) > >> > * Multi-tabbing (no other flash application should be running in > >> > different browsers or tabs) > >> > * Video/audio SIP integration (because it requires another program we > >> > don't want to mention anymore) > >> > > >> > Vasily, could you please help adding bug numbers to each line of the > >> notes? > >> > The last item intentionally has a weird explanation, but that's what I > >> > get from Artyom's letter. Artyom, could you please correct the last > >> > item in a way you think correctly reflects the state of SIP > >> > integration? > >> > > >> > I think we can ship release with reflected problems, this may help > >> > users not to seek things they won't get. With these release notes > >> > (improved with bug references and corrections) the release gets my +1. > >> > > >> > -- > >> > With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями, > >> > Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов, > >> > http://dataved.ru/ > >> > +7 916 562 8095 > >> > > >> > [1] Start using Apache Openmeetings today, > >> http://openmeetings.apache.org/ > >> > [2] Join Alexei Fedotov @linkedin, http://ru.linkedin.com/in/dataved/ > >> > [3] Join Alexei Fedotov @facebook, > http://www.facebook.com/openmeetings > >> > > >> > > >> > On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 2:17 AM, [email protected] > >> > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> I think Artyom is right. Red5Sip is not the scope of the OpenMeetings > >> >> project. > >> >> Me might discuss on how we can make it the scope, if we are able to > >> create > >> >> an Incubator project around Red5Sip. > >> >> > >> >> I think for the end user this discussion (scope or not) is a rather > >> >> esoteric discussion as they are simply interested in a working > product. > >> >> > >> >> However for the release, Artyom & Alexei, you are both PMC members, > have > >> >> you an opinion about the 2.1.1 release? > >> >> > >> >> Thanks, > >> >> Sebastian > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> 2013/6/24 Artyom Horuzhenko <[email protected]> > >> >> > >> >>> Hello Alexei, > >> >>> > >> >>> I've just changed sip integration instruction a little by adding > >> denoise > >> >>> and dsp_drop_silence attributes and removed silent detection in > red5sip > >> >>> because there were some problems with it. I think we shouldn't > include > >> any > >> >>> information about red5sip improvement into Openmeetings release > notes > >> >>> because red5sip is another application. > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> 2013/6/23 Alexei Fedotov <[email protected]> > >> >>> > >> >>> > Sebastian, I have tested audio SIP integration by using SIP bridge > >> for > >> >>> > my own conferences. As a result, Artyom found out that disabling > >> >>> > jitter-buffer in the Asterisk configuration improves audio. > Artyom, > >> >>> > where one can find your findings on the Apache web site? Does it > >> worth > >> >>> > reflecting this in release notes? > >> >>> > > >> >>> > -- > >> >>> > With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями, > >> >>> > Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов, > >> >>> > http://dataved.ru/ > >> >>> > +7 916 562 8095 > >> >>> > > >> >>> > [1] Start using Apache Openmeetings today, > >> >>> http://openmeetings.apache.org/ > >> >>> > [2] Join Alexei Fedotov @linkedin, > >> http://ru.linkedin.com/in/dataved/ > >> >>> > [3] Join Alexei Fedotov @facebook, > >> http://www.facebook.com/openmeetings > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 7:09 AM, [email protected] > >> >>> > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >>> > > We have 3 +1 votes from PMCs. So in theory it is possible. > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > However it would be good if there is some more feedback in the > >> >>> community > >> >>> > > about that release. > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > Anybody else has been testing this release? > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > Sebastian > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > 2013/6/22 Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]> > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > >> I believe we should release rc1. > >> >>> > >> > >> >>> > >> @Sebastian can you publish and announce the release? > >> >>> > >> > >> >>> > >> BTW I did paragliding from ~2300 meters in Turkey with > instructor > >> and > >> >>> > sky > >> >>> > >> acrobatics :) it was really amazing! :) > >> >>> > >> On Jun 22, 2013 3:36 AM, "[email protected]" < > >> >>> [email protected] > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > >> wrote: > >> >>> > >> > >> >>> > >> > I could only find one minor issue: > >> >>> > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-681 > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> > >> > I think that is still good to go out as a release. > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> > >> > +1 > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> > >> > Sebastian > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> > >> > 2013/6/22 [email protected] <[email protected]> > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > I am sorry for the delay. > >> >>> > >> > > > >> >>> > >> > > The vote is now actually outdated. > >> >>> > >> > > Shall we restart the vote process for 2.1.1 ? > >> >>> > >> > > > >> >>> > >> > > Sebastian > >> >>> > >> > > > >> >>> > >> > > > >> >>> > >> > > 2013/6/10 [email protected] <[email protected]> > >> >>> > >> > > > >> >>> > >> > > Release vote happens on dev list, never on private. Please > >> vote on > >> >>> > dev, > >> >>> > >> > as > >> >>> > >> > >> the link to the dev list will be what we publish as a > result > >> of > >> >>> the > >> >>> > >> > vote. > >> >>> > >> > >> > >> >>> > >> > >> I am sorry but I can't test before next week as I don't > have > >> a > >> >>> > >> Internet > >> >>> > >> > >> connection good enough while I travel abroad. > >> >>> > >> > >> > >> >>> > >> > >> Thanks, > >> >>> > >> > >> Sebastian > >> >>> > >> > >> > >> >>> > >> > >> > >> >>> > >> > >> > >> >>> > >> > >> > >> >>> > >> > >> 2013/6/8 Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]> > >> >>> > >> > >> > >> >>> > >> > >>> Dear OpenMeetings Community, > >> >>> > >> > >>> > >> >>> > >> > >>> I would like to start a vote about releasing Apache > >> OpenMeetings > >> >>> > >> 2.1.1 > >> >>> > >> > >>> RC1 > >> >>> > >> > >>> > >> >>> > >> > >>> Main changes are covered in the > >> >>> > >> > >>> > >> >>> > >> > >>> Readme: > >> >>> > >> > >>> > >> >>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openmeetings/tags/2.1.1RC1/README > >> >>> > >> > >>> > >> >>> > >> > >>> > >> >>> > >> > >>> Full Changelog: > >> >>> > >> > >>> > >> >>> > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openmeetings/tags/2.1.1RC1/CHANGELOG > >> >>> > >> > >>> > >> >>> > >> > >>> Release artifacts: > >> >>> > >> > >>> > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openmeetings/2.1.1/rc1/ > >> >>> > >> > >>> > >> >>> > >> > >>> Tag: > >> >>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openmeetings/tags/2.1.1RC1/ > >> >>> > >> > >>> > >> >>> > >> > >>> PGP release keys (signed using > >> >>> > >> > >>> C467526E): > >> >>> > >> > >>> > >> >>> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openmeetings/2.1.1/rc1/KEYS > >> >>> > >> > >>> > >> >>> > >> > >>> Vote will be open for 72 hours. > >> >>> > >> > >>> > >> >>> > >> > >>> [ ] +1 approve > >> >>> > >> > >>> [ ] +0 no opinion > >> >>> > >> > >>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > >> >>> > >> > >>> > >> >>> > >> > >>> My vote is +1. > >> >>> > >> > >>> > >> >>> > >> > >>> > >> >>> > >> > >>> > >> >>> > >> > >>> -- > >> >>> > >> > >>> WBR > >> >>> > >> > >>> Maxim aka solomax > >> >>> > >> > >>> > >> >>> > >> > >> > >> >>> > >> > >> > >> >>> > >> > >> > >> >>> > >> > >> -- > >> >>> > >> > >> Sebastian Wagner > >> >>> > >> > >> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock > >> >>> > >> > >> http://www.webbase-design.de > >> >>> > >> > >> http://www.wagner-sebastian.com > >> >>> > >> > >> [email protected] > >> >>> > >> > >> > >> >>> > >> > > > >> >>> > >> > > > >> >>> > >> > > > >> >>> > >> > > -- > >> >>> > >> > > Sebastian Wagner > >> >>> > >> > > https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock > >> >>> > >> > > http://www.webbase-design.de > >> >>> > >> > > http://www.wagner-sebastian.com > >> >>> > >> > > [email protected] > >> >>> > >> > > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> > >> > -- > >> >>> > >> > Sebastian Wagner > >> >>> > >> > https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock > >> >>> > >> > http://www.webbase-design.de > >> >>> > >> > http://www.wagner-sebastian.com > >> >>> > >> > [email protected] > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> > >> > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > -- > >> >>> > > Sebastian Wagner > >> >>> > > https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock > >> >>> > > http://www.webbase-design.de > >> >>> > > http://www.wagner-sebastian.com > >> >>> > > [email protected] > >> >>> > > >> >>> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> -- > >> >> Sebastian Wagner > >> >> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock > >> >> http://www.webbase-design.de > >> >> http://www.wagner-sebastian.com > >> >> [email protected] > >> >
