Hi, Long time since I said anything and so how about, Happy Holidays, to start.
Just to say that the #2 doesn't surprise me at all and yes I would strongly suspect it has lots to do with OOXML. Don't forget that this does not necessarily mean interoperability with MSO it also means interchangeability with GDocs as best as I can tell. Thanks On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 11:22 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton <orc...@apache.org>wrote: > Concerning Microsoft Office interoperability, I suspect the absence of a > way to save documents in OOXML formats is a detractor from Apache > OpenOffice 3.4. There are the usual interchange fidelity issues as well, > depending on which interchangeable formats are used. > > - Dennis > > -----Original Message----- > From: janI [mailto:j...@apache.org] > Sent: Sunday, December 23, 2012 02:37 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: AOO questions on Google > > Thanks for the summary ! > > Personally I asumed that LO would be #1, but I am amazed about #2 (MS > Office interoperability and Other formats) I thought that was one of our > very strong sides. I might be worthwhile to look a bit deeper into that, > and see if the cause for the questions is in lack of features, lack of > documentation or someelse, to give a clue of what to do ? Maybe we can do > something with 4.0. > > Jan I. > > On 23 December 2012 04:00, F C. Costero <fjcc.apa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > [ ... ] > > MS Office interoperability 54 > > Non-English 15 > > Other formats 54 > [ ... ] > >
