On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 01:29:57AM +0200, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > On 25/04/2013 janI wrote: > >I find your document quite good (a > >little light on details), and I look forward to help you (among others) > >with a projects that will benefit many end-users. > > It's time to discuss this a bit. The project as a whole is clearly > going to give the best possible support to Rajath and other GSoC > applicants, but we need a technical mentor for each project, i.e., > someone who can help with the actual programming, evaluate/integrate > code, suggest how to improve it according to the project's best > practices and so on. > > If I understood correctly Alexandro posted the idea as a "promoter", > but he won't be the "technical mentor" we need to identify (or are > you going to take care of this, Alexandro? I just note you are not a > regular code contributor in that area -neither I am, of course- but > I may be wrong about your intentions). So, even though everybody on > the list can help, who is available to act as the main technical > mentor for Rajath and take responsibility for evaluating the outcome > if the application gets accepted?
@Rajath given the lack of response about this topic, I'd suggest you pick another project. May be the CMIS UCP is still available (for this one, there is a qualified mentor). Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile La Plata, Argentina
pgpTiyyTSlx2h.pgp
Description: PGP signature
