On 18 July 2013 16:50, Rob Weir <robw...@apache.org> wrote:

> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 10:33 AM, janI <j...@apache.org> wrote:
> > On 18 July 2013 15:29, Rob Weir <robw...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >> We have the opportunity to restructure the pages on our CWiki.    When
> >> looking over the current structure it looks like we've been taking two
> >> entirely different approaches to organizing the information:
> >>
> >> 1) A team-oriented approach, where at the top organizational level
> >> there are parent pages for each team, dev, qa, doc, l10n., etc.
> >>
> >> 2) A release-oriented approach, where the top level is a specific
> >> release, like AOO 3.4.1 or 4.0, and subpages are used for status and
> >> plans for functional groups.
> >>
> >> These two approaches look like they are both being used, but not
> >> consistently.
> >>
> >> I wonder if would be worth being more consistent, and doing something
> like:
> >>
> >> 1) Have a top-level page for each functional group, for tracking
> >> release-independent information, e.g., links to useful other pages,
> >> lists of volunteers, "how to" information.  The stuff that does not
> >> change from release to release.  It is information about the team and
> >> what they do, not information about tasks for a specific release.
> >>
> >> 2) Then have top-level release-specific pages, where we store plans
> >> and status reports, dashboards, etc., associated with a release.
> >>
> >> I think this is not so far from what the CWiki was evolving toward.
> >>
> >
> > If we anyhow think about restructuring, why not also think of a merge
> with
> > mwiki...it does not seem correct that we need all these flavours of wiki,
> > and it do cost maintenance.
> >
>
> Restructuring is just drag and drop in CWiki.  Migration would be more
> effort, but we could restructure while migrating.  But a non-trivial
> effort unless there is a tool that automates page conversion, moving
> images, etc.
>

So because its complicated we keep maintaining at 2 different
products....We should have been a goverment agency.

But I get your point, and wont press further for a simpler maintenance.

rgds
jan I.


>
> -Rob
>
> > rgds
> > jan I.
> >
> >
> >>
> >> -Rob
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> >>
> >>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>
>

Reply via email to