> From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
> > *In OOo it was possible for many years, are members of AOO > project less wise, to distinguish it?* > > > >> > >> But I've a suggestion. ;-) > >> > >> What about to name the new ML like what its purpose should be > >> (coordinate the project work): > >> > >> project-de@ > > > > project-de@ would also be OK (maybe better > projectwork-de@?), but is it really necessary? > > > > I think "dev" is understandable for everyone, but is > "project" also, or will people ask what the difference is? > > > > In my opinion both are "dev" and "project"/"projectwork" > suitable, but "project"/ "projectwork" is _not_ really better. > > > > > > my vote is: > > > > project-de or projectwork-de: +0.5 > > > > dev-de: +1 > > > > I think it is potentially confusing either way. There is no "German > project". You're absolutely right and I hope it will be able to change that in the future, because it is a big problem for a software aimed at end users. But now is not "future", therefore it is correct to assume that there is no "German AOO(!) Project", but the requested mailing list would be very useful, the feel of the German community zugehörtig for the work of the people. However, the language of this list is, advantageously, be German, *and I see no reason to have to hide this fact in a free project*. I understand very well that we must avoid giving the impression that it was a mailing list of the German project, because there is no German project, but I see no reason not to choose the name of the list so that it is clear that the language of this list is German. > So long as the description on the website is clear, I don't care if > you call it superwunderbarp...@openoffice.apache.org -1 Greetings, Jörg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
