On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 12:09 AM, Jörg Schmidt <joe...@j-m-schmidt.de>wrote:
> > From: Andrea Pescetti [mailto:pesce...@apache.org] > > Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2013 2:10 PM > > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > > Subject: Re: German community needs a second mailing list for > > effective working > > > > jan i wrote: > > > +1 from me, my only concern is how to make sure important > > information is > > > not kept solely on dev-de (important may also be hints > > about how to compile > > > etc). I see a heavy burden on the moderators to ensure that > > this happens. > > > > It depends on the focus, but from Joerg's initial > > description, the new > > list would help "distinguish general user questions from specific > > discussions among the project members", so the structure seems very > > similar to the two mailing lists in Italian (one for > > users/support, one > > for volunteers/coordination/discussions). Moderation is easy > > in this case. > > Exact. > > Let me say once again absolutely clear, the new list of > "dev...@openoffice.apache.org" to record all information will be already > today on > the other de-list (users...@openoffice.apache.org) and for project work > are > important, nothing is what it are lost. > > (Note: Today's "users...@openoffice.apache.org" is in fact not what the > name says, > but rather in truth it is a 'dev-and-users...@openoffice.apache.org', and > that > makes problems.) > > > > Greetings, > Jörg > In concept, I don't have objections to this new list, but wish it could be named something other than "dev-de" so it doesn't get confused with dev@openoffice.apache.org. But...I don't have any suggestions. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > > -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MzK "Cats do not have to be shown how to have a good time, for they are unfailing ingenious in that respect." -- James Mason
