On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 3:43 AM, jan i <j...@apache.org> wrote:

> Hi.
> We have now for a while had a readonly Git copy of our svn repo.
> Should we move to a full git repo, making it easier for new developers to
> participate (although it is in no way a guarantee, that it will attract new
> people) by lowering the barrier.
> For more documentation on Git at Apache see https://git-wip-us.apache.org/
> Moving to a full git repo (see http://git.apache.org/), would mean giving
> up our current SVN repo, but history etc. will be available in Git instead.
> The choice is there, and it is just a matter of how people want to work.
> thoughts ?
> rgds
> jan I.

I'm not sure I understand the comment about making things easier but then
I'm not a git user currently. I'm good with svn.
I know we have read only git right now.


"An old horse for a long, hard road,
 a young pony for a quick ride."
                        -- Texas Bix Bender

Reply via email to